TY - JOUR
T1 - Body size and behavioural plasticity interact to influence the performance of free-foraging bumble bee colonies
AU - Holland, Jacob G.
AU - Nakayama, Shinnosuke
AU - Porfiri, Maurizio
AU - Nov, Oded
AU - Bloch, Guy
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: This research was supported by grants from the National Academies Keck Futures Initiative (NAKFI, to O.N., G.B. and M.P.), the US–Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF-NSF in Biology (ICOB) 2012807 to G.B.), the US–Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development (BARD) fund (IS-4418-11 to G.B.), and a Lady Davis Fellowship held by J.G.H.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - Specialisation and plasticity are important for many forms of collective behaviour, but the interplay between these factors is little understood. In insect societies, workers are often developmentally primed to specialise in different tasks, sometimes with morphological or physiological adaptations, facilitating a division of labour. Workers may also plastically switch between tasks or vary their effort. The degree to which developmentally primed specialisation limits plasticity is not clear and has not been systematically tested in ecologically relevant contexts. We addressed this question in 20 free-foraging bumble bee (Bombus terrestris) colonies by continually manipulating colonies to contain either a typically diverse, or a reduced (“homogeneous”), worker body size distribution while keeping the same mean body size, over two trials. Pooling both trials, diverse colonies produced a larger comb mass, an index of colony performance. The link between body size and task was further corroborated by the finding that foragers were larger than nurses even in homogeneous colonies with a very narrow body size range. However, the overall effect of size diversity stemmed mostly from one trial. In the other trial, homogeneous and diverse colonies showed comparable performance. By comparing behavioural profiles based on several thousand observations of individuals, we found evidence that workers in homogeneous colonies in this trial rescued colony performance by plastically increasing behavioural specialisation and/or individual effort, compared to same-sized individuals in diverse colonies. Our results are consistent with a benefit to colonies of large and small specialists under certain conditions, but also suggest that plasticity or effort can compensate for reduced (size-related) specialisation. Thus, we suggest that an intricate interplay between specialisation and plasticity is functionally adaptive in bumble bee colonies.
AB - Specialisation and plasticity are important for many forms of collective behaviour, but the interplay between these factors is little understood. In insect societies, workers are often developmentally primed to specialise in different tasks, sometimes with morphological or physiological adaptations, facilitating a division of labour. Workers may also plastically switch between tasks or vary their effort. The degree to which developmentally primed specialisation limits plasticity is not clear and has not been systematically tested in ecologically relevant contexts. We addressed this question in 20 free-foraging bumble bee (Bombus terrestris) colonies by continually manipulating colonies to contain either a typically diverse, or a reduced (“homogeneous”), worker body size distribution while keeping the same mean body size, over two trials. Pooling both trials, diverse colonies produced a larger comb mass, an index of colony performance. The link between body size and task was further corroborated by the finding that foragers were larger than nurses even in homogeneous colonies with a very narrow body size range. However, the overall effect of size diversity stemmed mostly from one trial. In the other trial, homogeneous and diverse colonies showed comparable performance. By comparing behavioural profiles based on several thousand observations of individuals, we found evidence that workers in homogeneous colonies in this trial rescued colony performance by plastically increasing behavioural specialisation and/or individual effort, compared to same-sized individuals in diverse colonies. Our results are consistent with a benefit to colonies of large and small specialists under certain conditions, but also suggest that plasticity or effort can compensate for reduced (size-related) specialisation. Thus, we suggest that an intricate interplay between specialisation and plasticity is functionally adaptive in bumble bee colonies.
KW - Colony composition
KW - Colony manipulation
KW - Continuous size distribution
KW - Individual variability
KW - Response threshold
KW - Social insects
KW - Task allocation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102926988&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102926988&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/insects12030236
DO - 10.3390/insects12030236
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85102926988
SN - 2075-4450
VL - 12
SP - 1
EP - 20
JO - Insects
JF - Insects
IS - 3
M1 - 236
ER -