Calorie labeling, Fast food purchasing and restaurant visits

Brian Elbel, Tod Mijanovich, L. Beth Dixon, Courtney Abrams, Beth Weitzman, Rogan Kersh, Amy H. Auchincloss, Gbenga Ogedegbe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective Obesity is a pressing public health problem without proven population-wide solutions. Researchers sought to determine whether a city-mandated policy requiring calorie labeling at fast food restaurants was associated with consumer awareness of labels, calories purchased and fast food restaurant visits. Design and Methods Difference-in-differences design, with data collected from consumers outside fast food restaurants and via a random digit dial telephone survey, before (December 2009) and after (June 2010) labeling in Philadelphia (which implemented mandatory labeling) and Baltimore (matched comparison city). Measures included: self-reported use of calorie information, calories purchased determined via fast food receipts, and self-reported weekly fast-food visits. Results The consumer sample was predominantly Black (71%), and high school educated (62%). Postlabeling, 38% of Philadelphia consumers noticed the calorie labels for a 33% point (P < 0.001) increase relative to Baltimore. Calories purchased and number of fast food visits did not change in either city over time. Conclusions While some consumers report noticing and using calorie information, no population level changes were noted in calories purchased or fast food visits. Other controlled studies are needed to examine the longer term impact of labeling as it becomes national law.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2172-2179
Number of pages8
JournalObesity
Volume21
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2013

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Endocrinology
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Calorie labeling, Fast food purchasing and restaurant visits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this