Can a contractarian be a paternalist? The logic of James M. Buchanan’s system

Mario J. Rizzo, Malte F. Dold

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    At various points in his work, James Buchanan mentions favorably the idea of private constitutional choice, that is, it can be rational for a present-biased individual to constrain her future behavior by self-imposed rules of personal conduct. Given that in a classical liberal world such self-constitutions would face no political or legal obstacle, we ask whether reasonable people would call on the state to assist them in the enforcement of their personal constitutions. In this paper, we provide several arguments for the incompatibility of Buchanan’s contractarianism with various forms of state paternalism.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)495-507
    Number of pages13
    JournalPublic Choice
    Volume183
    Issue number3-4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jun 1 2020

    Keywords

    • Contractarianism
    • James Buchanan
    • Paternalism
    • Rules
    • Self-constitutions

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science
    • Economics and Econometrics

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Can a contractarian be a paternalist? The logic of James M. Buchanan’s system'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this