Can you become one of us? A historical comparison of legal selection of ‘assimilable’ immigrants in Europe and the Americas

David S. FitzGerald, David Cook-Martín, Angela S. García, Rawan Arar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Pre-arrival integration tests used by European countries suggest discriminatory measures subtly persist in immigration laws. This paper draws on a comparison across the Americas and Europe to identify and explain historical continuities and discontinuities in ‘assimilability’ admissions requirements. We attribute legal shifts at the turn of the twenty-first century to the institutionalised delegitimisation of biological racism and the rise of permanent settlement immigration to Europe. Efforts to reduce Muslim immigration largely motivate contemporary European policies, but these policies test putative individual capacity to integrate rather than inferring it from a racial group categorisation, as did historical precedents in the Americas.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)27-47
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
Volume44
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2018

Keywords

  • Integration
  • Islamophobia
  • assimilation
  • immigration
  • racism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Demography
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Can you become one of us? A historical comparison of legal selection of ‘assimilable’ immigrants in Europe and the Americas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this