TY - GEN
T1 - CAnDy-TM
T2 - 20th Design, Automation and Test in Europe, DATE 2017
AU - Bukhari, Syed Ali Asadullah
AU - Lodhi, Faiq Khalid
AU - Hasan, Osman
AU - Shafique, Muhammad
AU - Henkel, Jorg
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 IEEE.
Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/5/11
Y1 - 2017/5/11
N2 - Dynamic thermal management (DTM) techniques based on task migration provide a promising solution to mitigate thermal emergencies and thereby ensuring safe operation and reliability of Many-Core systems. These techniques can be classified as central or distributed on the basis of a central DTM controller for the whole system or individual DTM controllers for each core or set of cores in the system, respectively. However, having a trustworthy comparison between central (c-) and distributed (d-) DTM techniques to find out the most suitable one for a given system is quite challenging. This is primarily due to the systemic difference between cDTM and dDTM controllers, and the inherent non-exhaustiveness of simulation and emulation methods conventionally used for DTM analysis. In this paper, we present a novel methodology called CAnDy-TM (stands for Comparative Analysis of Dynamic Thermal Management) that employs Model Checking to perform formal comparative analysis for cDTM and dDTM techniques. We identify a set of generic functional and performance properties to provide a common ground for their comparison. We demonstrate the usability and benefits of our methodology by comparing state-of-the-art cDTM and dDTM techniques, and illustrate which technique is good w.r.t. thermal stability and other task migration parameters. Such an analysis helps in selecting the most appropriate DTM for a given chip.
AB - Dynamic thermal management (DTM) techniques based on task migration provide a promising solution to mitigate thermal emergencies and thereby ensuring safe operation and reliability of Many-Core systems. These techniques can be classified as central or distributed on the basis of a central DTM controller for the whole system or individual DTM controllers for each core or set of cores in the system, respectively. However, having a trustworthy comparison between central (c-) and distributed (d-) DTM techniques to find out the most suitable one for a given system is quite challenging. This is primarily due to the systemic difference between cDTM and dDTM controllers, and the inherent non-exhaustiveness of simulation and emulation methods conventionally used for DTM analysis. In this paper, we present a novel methodology called CAnDy-TM (stands for Comparative Analysis of Dynamic Thermal Management) that employs Model Checking to perform formal comparative analysis for cDTM and dDTM techniques. We identify a set of generic functional and performance properties to provide a common ground for their comparison. We demonstrate the usability and benefits of our methodology by comparing state-of-the-art cDTM and dDTM techniques, and illustrate which technique is good w.r.t. thermal stability and other task migration parameters. Such an analysis helps in selecting the most appropriate DTM for a given chip.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020166566&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020166566&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.23919/DATE.2017.7927191
DO - 10.23919/DATE.2017.7927191
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85020166566
T3 - Proceedings of the 2017 Design, Automation and Test in Europe, DATE 2017
SP - 1289
EP - 1292
BT - Proceedings of the 2017 Design, Automation and Test in Europe, DATE 2017
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Y2 - 27 March 2017 through 31 March 2017
ER -