Causal inference accounts for heading perception in the presence of object motion

Kalpana Dokka, Hyeshin Park, Michael Jansen, Gregory C. DeAngelis, Dora E. Angelaki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


The brain infers our spatial orientation and properties of the world from ambiguous and noisy sensory cues. Judging self-motion (heading) in the presence of independently moving objects poses a challenging inference problem because the image motion of an object could be attributed to movement of the object, self-motion, or some combination of the two. We test whether perception of heading and object motion follows predictions of a normative causal inference framework. In a dual-report task, subjects indicated whether an object appeared stationary or moving in the virtual world, while simultaneously judging their heading. Consistent with causal inference predictions, the proportion of object stationarity reports, as well as the accuracy and precision of heading judgments, depended on the speed of object motion. Critically, biases in perceived heading declined when the object was perceived to be moving in the world. Our findings suggest that the brain interprets object motion and self-motion using a causal inference framework.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)9060-9065
Number of pages6
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Issue number18
StatePublished - Apr 30 2019


  • Causal inference
  • Heading
  • Multisensory
  • Object motion
  • Optic flow

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General


Dive into the research topics of 'Causal inference accounts for heading perception in the presence of object motion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this