TY - JOUR
T1 - Children's overregularization of English plurals
T2 - A quantitative analysis
AU - Marcus, Gary F.
N1 - Funding Information:
[*] I thank Steven Pinker, Fei Xu and two anonymous reviewers for comments on an earlier draft. This research was funded by an NDSE Graduate Fellowship to Marcus, NIH Grant HD 18381 to Steven Pinker (MIT), and grants from NIMH (training grant T32 MH18823) and the McDonnell-Pew Program in Cognitive Neuroscience to MIT's Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences. Address for correspondence: Gary Marcus, Department of Psychology, Tobin Hall, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA. E-mail: [email protected].
PY - 1995/6
Y1 - 1995/6
N2 - This paper brings a quantitative study of children's noun plural overregularizations (foots mans) to bear on recent comparisons of connectionist and symbolic models of language. The speech of io English-speaking children (aged I; 3 to 5; 2) from the CHILDES database (MacWhinney & Snow, 1985, 1990) were analysed. The rate of noun overregularization is low, mean = 8.5 %, demonstrating that children prefer correct to overregularized forms. Rates of noun overregularization are not significantly different from their rates of past tense overregularization, and noun plurals, like verb past tenses, follow a U-shaped developmental curve in which correct irregulars precede the first overregularized forms. These facts suggest that plural and past tense overregularizations are caused by similar underlying processes. The results pose challenges to connectionist models, but are consistent with Marcus et al.‘s (1992) blocking-and-retrieval-failure model in which regulars are generated by a default rule while irregulars are retrieved from the lexicon.
AB - This paper brings a quantitative study of children's noun plural overregularizations (foots mans) to bear on recent comparisons of connectionist and symbolic models of language. The speech of io English-speaking children (aged I; 3 to 5; 2) from the CHILDES database (MacWhinney & Snow, 1985, 1990) were analysed. The rate of noun overregularization is low, mean = 8.5 %, demonstrating that children prefer correct to overregularized forms. Rates of noun overregularization are not significantly different from their rates of past tense overregularization, and noun plurals, like verb past tenses, follow a U-shaped developmental curve in which correct irregulars precede the first overregularized forms. These facts suggest that plural and past tense overregularizations are caused by similar underlying processes. The results pose challenges to connectionist models, but are consistent with Marcus et al.‘s (1992) blocking-and-retrieval-failure model in which regulars are generated by a default rule while irregulars are retrieved from the lexicon.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029312628&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029312628&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0305000900009879
DO - 10.1017/S0305000900009879
M3 - Article
C2 - 8550732
AN - SCOPUS:0029312628
SN - 0305-0009
VL - 22
SP - 447
EP - 459
JO - Journal of child language
JF - Journal of child language
IS - 2
ER -