Clinical and histological evaluation of socket grafting using different types of bone substitute in adult patients

James Rudolph Collins; Ely Jiménez; Carol Martínez; Rubén Tobias Polanco; Ronaldo Hirata; Ramy Mousa; Paulo G. Coelho; Estevam A. Bonfante; Nick Tovar

doi:10.1097/ID.0000000000000106

Clinical and histological evaluation of socket grafting using different types of bone substitute in adult patients

James Rudolph Collins, Ely Jiménez, Carol Martínez, Rubén Tobias Polanco, Ronaldo Hirata, Ramy Mousa, Paulo G. Coelho, Estevam A. Bonfante, Nick Tovar

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

PURPOSE:: This clinical and histological study evaluated the healing of extraction sockets after implantation of a biphasic calcium sulfate (CS) alone or in combination with a gamma-radiated human mineralized allograft. MATERIALS AND METHODS:: Ten healthy adult patients participated in the study. A minimum of 2 teeth, per patient, extracted for different reasons were evaluated. Each socket was randomly filled to the crest with either (a) a biphasic CS or (b) large particulate gamma-radiated human mineralized allograft in combination with a biphasic CS. RESULTS:: No complications during reentry of the socket site during bone core retrieval, such as inflammation/immunogenic response, were observed. Histological findings showed a mean new bone (NB) of 33% for sockets filled with biphasic CS and 31% for sockets filled with biphasic CS in combination with allograft material. There was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of NB and the presence of soft tissue between graft materials. CONCLUSION:: Biphasic CS used alone or in combination with an allograft resulted in the same amount of NB formation in alveolar ridge preservation procedures.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	489-495
Number of pages	7
Journal	Implant dentistry
Volume	23
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000106
State	Published - Aug 2014

Keywords

bone regeneration
clinical
graft
socket preservation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Oral Surgery

Access to Document

10.1097/ID.0000000000000106

Cite this

@article{c987368e8a2f4fe5b1d2fcde24cc3031,

title = "Clinical and histological evaluation of socket grafting using different types of bone substitute in adult patients",

abstract = "PURPOSE:: This clinical and histological study evaluated the healing of extraction sockets after implantation of a biphasic calcium sulfate (CS) alone or in combination with a gamma-radiated human mineralized allograft. MATERIALS AND METHODS:: Ten healthy adult patients participated in the study. A minimum of 2 teeth, per patient, extracted for different reasons were evaluated. Each socket was randomly filled to the crest with either (a) a biphasic CS or (b) large particulate gamma-radiated human mineralized allograft in combination with a biphasic CS. RESULTS:: No complications during reentry of the socket site during bone core retrieval, such as inflammation/immunogenic response, were observed. Histological findings showed a mean new bone (NB) of 33% for sockets filled with biphasic CS and 31% for sockets filled with biphasic CS in combination with allograft material. There was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of NB and the presence of soft tissue between graft materials. CONCLUSION:: Biphasic CS used alone or in combination with an allograft resulted in the same amount of NB formation in alveolar ridge preservation procedures.",

keywords = "bone regeneration, clinical, graft, socket preservation",

author = "Collins, {James Rudolph} and Ely Jim{\'e}nez and Carol Mart{\'i}nez and Polanco, {Rub{\'e}n Tobias} and Ronaldo Hirata and Ramy Mousa and Coelho, {Paulo G.} and Bonfante, {Estevam A.} and Nick Tovar",

year = "2014",

month = aug,

doi = "10.1097/ID.0000000000000106",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "23",

pages = "489--495",

journal = "Implant dentistry",

issn = "1056-6163",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd.",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical and histological evaluation of socket grafting using different types of bone substitute in adult patients

AU - Collins, James Rudolph

AU - Jiménez, Ely

AU - Martínez, Carol

AU - Polanco, Rubén Tobias

AU - Hirata, Ronaldo

AU - Mousa, Ramy

AU - Coelho, Paulo G.

AU - Bonfante, Estevam A.

AU - Tovar, Nick

PY - 2014/8

Y1 - 2014/8

N2 - PURPOSE:: This clinical and histological study evaluated the healing of extraction sockets after implantation of a biphasic calcium sulfate (CS) alone or in combination with a gamma-radiated human mineralized allograft. MATERIALS AND METHODS:: Ten healthy adult patients participated in the study. A minimum of 2 teeth, per patient, extracted for different reasons were evaluated. Each socket was randomly filled to the crest with either (a) a biphasic CS or (b) large particulate gamma-radiated human mineralized allograft in combination with a biphasic CS. RESULTS:: No complications during reentry of the socket site during bone core retrieval, such as inflammation/immunogenic response, were observed. Histological findings showed a mean new bone (NB) of 33% for sockets filled with biphasic CS and 31% for sockets filled with biphasic CS in combination with allograft material. There was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of NB and the presence of soft tissue between graft materials. CONCLUSION:: Biphasic CS used alone or in combination with an allograft resulted in the same amount of NB formation in alveolar ridge preservation procedures.

AB - PURPOSE:: This clinical and histological study evaluated the healing of extraction sockets after implantation of a biphasic calcium sulfate (CS) alone or in combination with a gamma-radiated human mineralized allograft. MATERIALS AND METHODS:: Ten healthy adult patients participated in the study. A minimum of 2 teeth, per patient, extracted for different reasons were evaluated. Each socket was randomly filled to the crest with either (a) a biphasic CS or (b) large particulate gamma-radiated human mineralized allograft in combination with a biphasic CS. RESULTS:: No complications during reentry of the socket site during bone core retrieval, such as inflammation/immunogenic response, were observed. Histological findings showed a mean new bone (NB) of 33% for sockets filled with biphasic CS and 31% for sockets filled with biphasic CS in combination with allograft material. There was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of NB and the presence of soft tissue between graft materials. CONCLUSION:: Biphasic CS used alone or in combination with an allograft resulted in the same amount of NB formation in alveolar ridge preservation procedures.

KW - bone regeneration

KW - clinical

KW - graft

KW - socket preservation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905086634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905086634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ID.0000000000000106

DO - 10.1097/ID.0000000000000106

M3 - Article

C2 - 25025854

AN - SCOPUS:84905086634

SN - 1056-6163

VL - 23

SP - 489

EP - 495

JO - Implant dentistry

JF - Implant dentistry

IS - 4

ER -

Clinical and histological evaluation of socket grafting using different types of bone substitute in adult patients

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this