TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinician perspectives on the benefits of practice facilitation for small primary care practices
AU - Rogers, Erin S.
AU - Cuthel, Allison M.
AU - Berry, Carolyn A.
AU - Kaplan, Sue A.
AU - Shelley, Donna R.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding support: This project was supported by grant number 1R18HS023922 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Annals of Family Medicine, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/8
Y1 - 2019/8
N2 - PURPOSE Small independent primary care practices (SIPs) often lack the resources to implement system changes. HealthyHearts NYC, funded through the EvidenceNOW initiative of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, studied the effectiveness of practice facilitation to improve cardiovascular disease– related care in 257 SIPs. We sought to understand SIP clinicians’ perspectives on the benefits of practice facilitation. METHODS We conducted in-depth interviews with 19 SIP clinicians enrolled in HealthyHearts NYC. Interviews were transcribed and coded using deductive and inductive approaches. To understand whether the perceived benefits of practice facilitation differ based on the availability of internal staff for quality improvement (QI), we compared themes pertaining to benefits between practices with 3 or fewer office staff vs more than 3 office staff. RESULTS Clinicians perceived 2 main benefits of practice facilitation. First, facilitators served as a connection to the external health care environment for SIPs, often through teaching and information sharing. Second, facilitators provided electronic health record (EHR)/data expertise, often by teaching functionality and completing technical assistance and tasks. SIPs with more than 3 office staff felt that facilitators provided benefits primarily through teaching, whereas SIPs with 3 or fewer staff felt that facilitators also provided hands-on support. At the intersections of these benefits, there emerged 3 central practice facilitation benefits: (1) creating awareness of quality gaps, (2) connecting practices to information, resources, and strategies, and (3) optimizing the EHR for QI goals. CONCLUSIONS SIP clinicians perceived practice facilitation to be an important resource for connecting their practice to the external health care environment and resources, and helping their practice build QI capacity through teaching, hands-on support, and EHR-driven solutions.
AB - PURPOSE Small independent primary care practices (SIPs) often lack the resources to implement system changes. HealthyHearts NYC, funded through the EvidenceNOW initiative of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, studied the effectiveness of practice facilitation to improve cardiovascular disease– related care in 257 SIPs. We sought to understand SIP clinicians’ perspectives on the benefits of practice facilitation. METHODS We conducted in-depth interviews with 19 SIP clinicians enrolled in HealthyHearts NYC. Interviews were transcribed and coded using deductive and inductive approaches. To understand whether the perceived benefits of practice facilitation differ based on the availability of internal staff for quality improvement (QI), we compared themes pertaining to benefits between practices with 3 or fewer office staff vs more than 3 office staff. RESULTS Clinicians perceived 2 main benefits of practice facilitation. First, facilitators served as a connection to the external health care environment for SIPs, often through teaching and information sharing. Second, facilitators provided electronic health record (EHR)/data expertise, often by teaching functionality and completing technical assistance and tasks. SIPs with more than 3 office staff felt that facilitators provided benefits primarily through teaching, whereas SIPs with 3 or fewer staff felt that facilitators also provided hands-on support. At the intersections of these benefits, there emerged 3 central practice facilitation benefits: (1) creating awareness of quality gaps, (2) connecting practices to information, resources, and strategies, and (3) optimizing the EHR for QI goals. CONCLUSIONS SIP clinicians perceived practice facilitation to be an important resource for connecting their practice to the external health care environment and resources, and helping their practice build QI capacity through teaching, hands-on support, and EHR-driven solutions.
KW - Health information technology
KW - Organizational change
KW - Physician perspective
KW - Practice facilitation
KW - Practice transformation
KW - Practice-based research
KW - Primary care
KW - Professional practice
KW - Qualitative research
KW - Small independent primary care practices
KW - Primary Health Care/organization & administration
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - New York City
KW - Quality Improvement
KW - Female
KW - Interviews as Topic
KW - Qualitative Research
KW - Electronic Health Records/organization & administration
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072142014&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072142014&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1370/afm.2427
DO - 10.1370/afm.2427
M3 - Article
C2 - 31405872
AN - SCOPUS:85072142014
SN - 1544-1709
VL - 17
SP - S17-S23
JO - Annals of family medicine
JF - Annals of family medicine
IS - Suppl 1
ER -