TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinicians’ attitudes and system capacity regarding transitional care practices within a health system
T2 - Survey results from the partners-PCORI transitions study
AU - Magny-Normilus, Cherlie
AU - Nolido, Nyryan
AU - Samal, Lipika
AU - Thompson, Ryan
AU - Crevensten, Gwen
AU - Schnipper, Jeffrey L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/12/1
Y1 - 2021/12/1
N2 - Objectives: Successful efforts to improve transitional care depend in part on local attitudes, workload, and training. Before implementing a multifaceted transitions intervention within an Accountable Care Organization, an understanding of contextual factors among providers involved in care transitions in inpatient and outpatient settings was needed. Methods: As part of the Partners-Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Transitions Study, we purposefully sampled inpatient and outpatient providers within the Accountable Care Organization. Survey questions focused on training and feedback on transitional tasks and opinions on the quality of care transitions. We also surveyed unit- and practice-level leadership on current transitional care practices. Results are presented using descriptive statistics. Results: Among 387 providers surveyed, 220 responded (response rate = 57%) from 15 outpatient practices and 26 inpatient units. A large proportion of respondents reported to have never received training (50%) or feedback (68%) on key transitional care activities, and most (58%) reported insufficient time to complete these tasks. Respondents on average reported transitions processes led to positive outcomes some to most of the time (mean scores = 4.70–5.16 on a 1–7 scale). Surveys of leadership showed tremendous variation by unit and by practice in the performance of various transitional care activities. Conclusions: Many respondents felt that training, feedback, and time allotted to key transitional care activities were inadequate. Satisfaction with the quality of the transitions process was middling. Understanding these results, especially variation by location, was important to customizing implementation of the intervention and will be key to understanding variation in the success of the intervention across locations.
AB - Objectives: Successful efforts to improve transitional care depend in part on local attitudes, workload, and training. Before implementing a multifaceted transitions intervention within an Accountable Care Organization, an understanding of contextual factors among providers involved in care transitions in inpatient and outpatient settings was needed. Methods: As part of the Partners-Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Transitions Study, we purposefully sampled inpatient and outpatient providers within the Accountable Care Organization. Survey questions focused on training and feedback on transitional tasks and opinions on the quality of care transitions. We also surveyed unit- and practice-level leadership on current transitional care practices. Results are presented using descriptive statistics. Results: Among 387 providers surveyed, 220 responded (response rate = 57%) from 15 outpatient practices and 26 inpatient units. A large proportion of respondents reported to have never received training (50%) or feedback (68%) on key transitional care activities, and most (58%) reported insufficient time to complete these tasks. Respondents on average reported transitions processes led to positive outcomes some to most of the time (mean scores = 4.70–5.16 on a 1–7 scale). Surveys of leadership showed tremendous variation by unit and by practice in the performance of various transitional care activities. Conclusions: Many respondents felt that training, feedback, and time allotted to key transitional care activities were inadequate. Satisfaction with the quality of the transitions process was middling. Understanding these results, especially variation by location, was important to customizing implementation of the intervention and will be key to understanding variation in the success of the intervention across locations.
KW - Attitudes on care transitions
KW - Care transitions
KW - Environmental contexts
KW - Organizational system capacity
KW - Readmissions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106936888&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85106936888&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000664
DO - 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000664
M3 - Article
C2 - 32175956
AN - SCOPUS:85106936888
SN - 1549-8417
VL - 17
SP - E727-E731
JO - Journal of Patient Safety
JF - Journal of Patient Safety
IS - 8
ER -