TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinicians' training and interests in LE research
AU - Fu, Mei
AU - Armer, Jane
AU - Thiadens, Saskia
AU - Hurless, Vanessa
AU - Feldman, Joseph
AU - Ridner, Sheila
AU - Weiss, Jan
AU - Meringer, Patricia
AU - Tuppo, Catherine
AU - Meringer, Jospeh
AU - Cormier, Janice
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Background: It is essential to understand clinicians' research training to advance the field of lymphoedema through continuous research and implementation of evidence-based practice. Aims: To investigate clinicians' training, interests, and opinions regarding lymphoedema research. Methods: A survey was conducted by the National Lymphedema Network (NLN) Research Committee from 2007-2009. A sample of NLN professional members was recruited. Descriptive and comparative data analyses were performed. Results: Among 317 clinicians who completed the survey, 52.4% had received some formal research training. The clinicians rated the most important obstacles for research were lack of funds, followed by lack of time and lack of knowledge. Clinicians rated that the most beneficial education programme should focus on performing clinical research in a busy clinic setting with limited resources. Over 80% of the clinicians expressed interests in research training on critical evaluation of current lymphoedema research, development of research ideas and clinical protocols, and writing fundable grants. Conclusions: This survey identified clinicians' research training needs and obstacles. Professional organisations may use this information to strategically plan educational opportunities and venues. Declaration of interest: None.
AB - Background: It is essential to understand clinicians' research training to advance the field of lymphoedema through continuous research and implementation of evidence-based practice. Aims: To investigate clinicians' training, interests, and opinions regarding lymphoedema research. Methods: A survey was conducted by the National Lymphedema Network (NLN) Research Committee from 2007-2009. A sample of NLN professional members was recruited. Descriptive and comparative data analyses were performed. Results: Among 317 clinicians who completed the survey, 52.4% had received some formal research training. The clinicians rated the most important obstacles for research were lack of funds, followed by lack of time and lack of knowledge. Clinicians rated that the most beneficial education programme should focus on performing clinical research in a busy clinic setting with limited resources. Over 80% of the clinicians expressed interests in research training on critical evaluation of current lymphoedema research, development of research ideas and clinical protocols, and writing fundable grants. Conclusions: This survey identified clinicians' research training needs and obstacles. Professional organisations may use this information to strategically plan educational opportunities and venues. Declaration of interest: None.
KW - Clinicians' perspective
KW - Dissemination
KW - Evidence-based practice
KW - Lymphoedema
KW - Research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884401526&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884401526&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84884401526
SN - 1750-7235
VL - 6
SP - 24
EP - 29
JO - Journal of Lymphoedema
JF - Journal of Lymphoedema
IS - 1
ER -