Abstract
Differences in cognitive sophistication and effort are at the root of behavioral heterogeneity in economics. To explain this heterogeneity, behavioral models assume that certain choices indicate higher cognitive effort. A fundamental problem with this approach is that observing a choice does not reveal how the choice is made, and hence choice data is insufficient to establish the link between cognitive effort and behavior. We show that deliberation times provide an individually-measurable correlate of cognitive effort. We test a model of heterogeneous cognitive depth, incorporating stylized facts from the psychophysical literature, which makes predictions on the relation between choices, cognitive effort, incentives, and deliberation times. We confirm the predicted relations experimentally in different kinds of games.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 558-592 |
Number of pages | 35 |
Journal | Experimental Economics |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2021 |
Keywords
- Cognitive effort
- Cognitive sophistication
- Deliberation times
- Depth of reasoning
- Heterogeneity
- Iterative reasoning
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)