Comment on Makarieva et al. 'A critique of some modern applications of the Carnot heat engine concept: The dissipative heat engine cannot exist'

Marja Bister; Nilton Renno; Olivier Pauluis; Kerry Emanuel

doi:10.1098/rspa.2010.0087

Comment on Makarieva et al. 'A critique of some modern applications of the Carnot heat engine concept: The dissipative heat engine cannot exist'

Marja Bister, Nilton Renno, Olivier Pauluis, Kerry Emanuel

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Makarieva et al. (2010) assert that a dissipative heat engine is impossible and criticize earlier published work that they claim violates the laws of thermodynamics. Here we show that the earlier work does not violate fundamental physical laws and suggest that Makarieva et al. (2010) were misinterpreting expressions for wind speed as ones for work done on external objects. Moreover, we dispute their assertion that dissipative heating is necessarily compensated by a reduction of external heating.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1-6
Number of pages	6
Journal	Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
Volume	467
Issue number	2125
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2010.0087
State	Published - Jan 8 2011

Keywords

Carnot
Heat engine
Hurricane
Tropical cyclone

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Mathematics
General Engineering
General Physics and Astronomy

Access to Document

10.1098/rspa.2010.0087

Cite this

Comment on Makarieva et al. 'A critique of some modern applications of the Carnot heat engine concept: The dissipative heat engine cannot exist'. / Bister, Marja; Renno, Nilton; Pauluis, Olivier et al.
In: Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 467, No. 2125, 08.01.2011, p. 1-6.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

@article{335b8176107649bd9de997074642c8ab,

title = "Comment on Makarieva et al. 'A critique of some modern applications of the Carnot heat engine concept: The dissipative heat engine cannot exist'",

abstract = "Makarieva et al. (2010) assert that a dissipative heat engine is impossible and criticize earlier published work that they claim violates the laws of thermodynamics. Here we show that the earlier work does not violate fundamental physical laws and suggest that Makarieva et al. (2010) were misinterpreting expressions for wind speed as ones for work done on external objects. Moreover, we dispute their assertion that dissipative heating is necessarily compensated by a reduction of external heating.",

keywords = "Carnot, Heat engine, Hurricane, Tropical cyclone",

author = "Marja Bister and Nilton Renno and Olivier Pauluis and Kerry Emanuel",

year = "2011",

month = jan,

day = "8",

doi = "10.1098/rspa.2010.0087",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "467",

pages = "1--6",

journal = "Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences",

issn = "1364-5021",

publisher = "Royal Society of London",

number = "2125",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comment on Makarieva et al. 'A critique of some modern applications of the Carnot heat engine concept

T2 - The dissipative heat engine cannot exist'

AU - Bister, Marja

AU - Renno, Nilton

AU - Pauluis, Olivier

AU - Emanuel, Kerry

PY - 2011/1/8

Y1 - 2011/1/8

N2 - Makarieva et al. (2010) assert that a dissipative heat engine is impossible and criticize earlier published work that they claim violates the laws of thermodynamics. Here we show that the earlier work does not violate fundamental physical laws and suggest that Makarieva et al. (2010) were misinterpreting expressions for wind speed as ones for work done on external objects. Moreover, we dispute their assertion that dissipative heating is necessarily compensated by a reduction of external heating.

AB - Makarieva et al. (2010) assert that a dissipative heat engine is impossible and criticize earlier published work that they claim violates the laws of thermodynamics. Here we show that the earlier work does not violate fundamental physical laws and suggest that Makarieva et al. (2010) were misinterpreting expressions for wind speed as ones for work done on external objects. Moreover, we dispute their assertion that dissipative heating is necessarily compensated by a reduction of external heating.

KW - Carnot

KW - Heat engine

KW - Hurricane

KW - Tropical cyclone

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79251506056&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79251506056&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1098/rspa.2010.0087

DO - 10.1098/rspa.2010.0087

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79251506056

SN - 1364-5021

VL - 467

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

JF - Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

IS - 2125

ER -

Comment on Makarieva et al. 'A critique of some modern applications of the Carnot heat engine concept: The dissipative heat engine cannot exist'

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this