Comment on "Risk preferences are not time preferences": Separating risk and time preference

Bin Miao, Songfa Zhong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Andreoni and Sprenger (2012a,b) observe that utility functions are distinct for risk and time preferences, and show that their findings are consistent with a preference for certainty. We revisit this question in an enriched experimental setting in which subjects make intertemporal decisions under different risk conditions. The observed choice behavior supports a separation between risk attitude and intertemporal substitution rather than a preference for certainty. We further show that several models, including Epstein and Zin (1989); Chew and Epstein (1990); and Halevy (2008) exhibit such a separation and can account for the overall experimental findings. (JEL C91, D81, D91).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2272-2286
Number of pages15
JournalAmerican Economic Review
Volume105
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comment on "Risk preferences are not time preferences": Separating risk and time preference'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this