TY - JOUR
T1 - Comment on "Risk preferences are not time preferences"
T2 - Separating risk and time preference
AU - Miao, Bin
AU - Zhong, Songfa
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, American Economic Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/7/1
Y1 - 2015/7/1
N2 - Andreoni and Sprenger (2012a,b) observe that utility functions are distinct for risk and time preferences, and show that their findings are consistent with a preference for certainty. We revisit this question in an enriched experimental setting in which subjects make intertemporal decisions under different risk conditions. The observed choice behavior supports a separation between risk attitude and intertemporal substitution rather than a preference for certainty. We further show that several models, including Epstein and Zin (1989); Chew and Epstein (1990); and Halevy (2008) exhibit such a separation and can account for the overall experimental findings. (JEL C91, D81, D91).
AB - Andreoni and Sprenger (2012a,b) observe that utility functions are distinct for risk and time preferences, and show that their findings are consistent with a preference for certainty. We revisit this question in an enriched experimental setting in which subjects make intertemporal decisions under different risk conditions. The observed choice behavior supports a separation between risk attitude and intertemporal substitution rather than a preference for certainty. We further show that several models, including Epstein and Zin (1989); Chew and Epstein (1990); and Halevy (2008) exhibit such a separation and can account for the overall experimental findings. (JEL C91, D81, D91).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937622255&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937622255&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1257/aer.20131183
DO - 10.1257/aer.20131183
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84937622255
SN - 0002-8282
VL - 105
SP - 2272
EP - 2286
JO - American Economic Review
JF - American Economic Review
IS - 7
ER -