Commentary: Review: Existing evidence does not support a survival benefit for women with metastatic breast cancer who participate in group psychological interventions compared with usual care

Judith Haber

doi:10.1136/ebn.7.4.111

Commentary: Review: Existing evidence does not support a survival benefit for women with metastatic breast cancer who participate in group psychological interventions compared with usual care

Nursing

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	111
Number of pages	1
Journal	Evidence-Based Nursing
Volume	7
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1136/ebn.7.4.111
State	Published - 2004

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Fundamentals and skills

Access to Document

10.1136/ebn.7.4.111

Cite this

@article{3936b1b6825c4b538c85537711de0ec2,

title = "Commentary: Review: Existing evidence does not support a survival benefit for women with metastatic breast cancer who participate in group psychological interventions compared with usual care",

author = "Judith Haber",

year = "2004",

doi = "10.1136/ebn.7.4.111",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "7",

pages = "111",

journal = "Evidence-based nursing",

issn = "1367-6539",

publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Commentary

T2 - Review: Existing evidence does not support a survival benefit for women with metastatic breast cancer who participate in group psychological interventions compared with usual care

AU - Haber, Judith

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892723513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892723513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/ebn.7.4.111

DO - 10.1136/ebn.7.4.111

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:84892723513

VL - 7

SP - 111

JO - Evidence-based nursing

JF - Evidence-based nursing

SN - 1367-6539

IS - 4

ER -