Commentary: The need for research on PTSD in Children and adolescents – a commentary on Elliot et al. (2020)

Marylène Cloitre, Chris R. Brewin, Evaldas Kazlauskas, Brigitte Lueger-Schuster, Thanos Karatzias, Philip Hyland, Mark Shevlin

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

The recent release of the 11th version of The International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11: WHO, 2018) marked a significant departure from the previous similarities between it and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5; APA, 2013) in terms of their conceptualization of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The ICD-11 proposed a reduced symptom set for PTSD and a sibling disorder called Complex PTSD. There have been numerous studies that have provided support for the integrity of, and distinction between, PTSD and CPTSD diagnoses in adult samples. Elliot and colleagues (2020) have added to the research literature by providing a valuable examination of the differences between ICD and DSM PTSD/CPTSD in a sample of youth aged 8 to 17 years. This commentary reviews this study and reflects on the need for greater understanding of developmental changes in the presentation of PTSD and Complex PTSD.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)277-279
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines
Volume62
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2021

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Commentary: The need for research on PTSD in Children and adolescents – a commentary on Elliot et al. (2020)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this