Comparison of four techniques for the cementation of posts

Gary R. Goldstein, Stephen I. Hudis, Dale E. Weintraub

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Four techniques for the cementation of cast post restorations were compared in extracted single-rooted teeth. The techniques used were the lentula spiral, endodontic explorer, paper point, and direct post application. Evaluation was based on the presence of voids in the cement and retention of the post. The lentula spiral technique was performed without voids. The other techniques produced voids in increasing numbers in the following order: the endodontic explorer, direct application, and the paper point. The voids were commonly located along the shaft of the post, but there was no correlation between the number of voids and the retention of the posts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)209-211
Number of pages3
JournalThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume55
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1986

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of four techniques for the cementation of posts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this