TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of full thickness skin graft "take" after excision with the carbon dioxide laser and scalpel
AU - Schmidt, Brian L.
AU - Pogrel, M. A.
AU - Regezi, Joseph A.
AU - Smith, Robert
AU - Necoechea, Marcos
AU - Kearns, Gerard
AU - Azaz, Badri
PY - 1997
Y1 - 1997
N2 - Specific aim. To evaluate the take of skin grafts on conventionally prepared beds and on beds prepared by a carbon dioxide laser, with and without abrasion of the bed. Significance. Graft take is dependent on hemostasis, immobility, and nutrition of the graft. Scalpel excision of the skin graft can be associated with hemostatic difficulties and laser treatment of the skin graft bed can provide hemostasis. Abrasion of the bed after laser treatment may then be a means of opening small lymphatic and blood vessels to maintain the graft. Laser treatment followed by abrasion of the bed may provide an ideal graft base before suturing of the skin graft. Material and methods. Full-thickness skin grafts were taken with a scalpel at three sites on the dorsal skin of 24 guinea pigs. The three beds were prepared with pressure alone to provide hemostasis, laser vaporization followed by abrasion with gauze to produce pinpoint bleeding, and laser vaporization alone. The original skin from each of the sites was then sutured back in place. At postoperative days 1, 3, 5, 10, 21, and 35 the graft sites were assessed clinically for "take." Laser Doppler measurements were also made to evaluate blood flow. Histologie sections of the three sites were prepared, Immunohistochemical analysis was performed to evaluate cell proliferation and angiogenesis. Results. For the animals sacrificed through day 10 the rate of take for the sites that were not lased was 100%. For the sites that were lased alone and lased and abraded the rate of take was 71 % with no difference between the two techniques. The lased sites demonstrated increased inflammatory response and graft necrosis, Immunohistochemical analysis showed increased cellular proliferation and angiogenesis in the bed. Discussion. Grafts take best on a scalpel-prepared bed. Laser preparation of the bed, with or without abrasion, demonstrates decreased "take." Therefore the carbon dioxide laser is not a recommended means to take a graft or prepare the graft bed.
AB - Specific aim. To evaluate the take of skin grafts on conventionally prepared beds and on beds prepared by a carbon dioxide laser, with and without abrasion of the bed. Significance. Graft take is dependent on hemostasis, immobility, and nutrition of the graft. Scalpel excision of the skin graft can be associated with hemostatic difficulties and laser treatment of the skin graft bed can provide hemostasis. Abrasion of the bed after laser treatment may then be a means of opening small lymphatic and blood vessels to maintain the graft. Laser treatment followed by abrasion of the bed may provide an ideal graft base before suturing of the skin graft. Material and methods. Full-thickness skin grafts were taken with a scalpel at three sites on the dorsal skin of 24 guinea pigs. The three beds were prepared with pressure alone to provide hemostasis, laser vaporization followed by abrasion with gauze to produce pinpoint bleeding, and laser vaporization alone. The original skin from each of the sites was then sutured back in place. At postoperative days 1, 3, 5, 10, 21, and 35 the graft sites were assessed clinically for "take." Laser Doppler measurements were also made to evaluate blood flow. Histologie sections of the three sites were prepared, Immunohistochemical analysis was performed to evaluate cell proliferation and angiogenesis. Results. For the animals sacrificed through day 10 the rate of take for the sites that were not lased was 100%. For the sites that were lased alone and lased and abraded the rate of take was 71 % with no difference between the two techniques. The lased sites demonstrated increased inflammatory response and graft necrosis, Immunohistochemical analysis showed increased cellular proliferation and angiogenesis in the bed. Discussion. Grafts take best on a scalpel-prepared bed. Laser preparation of the bed, with or without abrasion, demonstrates decreased "take." Therefore the carbon dioxide laser is not a recommended means to take a graft or prepare the graft bed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031065221&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031065221&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1079-2104(97)90007-X
DO - 10.1016/S1079-2104(97)90007-X
M3 - Article
C2 - 9117752
AN - SCOPUS:0031065221
SN - 1079-2104
VL - 83
SP - 206
EP - 214
JO - Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics
JF - Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics
IS - 2
ER -