Comparison of In-situ Nondestructive Testing and Ex-situ Methods in Additive Manufactured Specimens for Internal Feature Detection

Youssef AbouelNour, Nikhil Gupta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The effectiveness and repeatability of Additive Manufacturing (AM) technologies has been often measured through rigorous testing, both in-situ and ex-situ. In-situ nondestructive testing (NDT) has been used to understand the AM process and detect anomalies during the build. Ex-situ testing has been used for material characterization and internal defect detection. In this work, in-situ NDT and ex-situ testing methods are compared as applied to a Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) process to detect defects that have formed internally in the part. Intentionally embedded features and defects are monitored and analyzed in-situ and ex-situ. Results from an automated image-based real-time defect detection system, an ultrasound ex-situ system, and a tensile testing system are compared to detect defects and their effects on mechanical properties. Real-time image-based defect detection is found to effectively spot defects as they form and allow the potential for implementing defect correction methods, while ex-situ tensile testing can be used as a form of validation to in-situ results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)20-31
Number of pages12
JournalResearch in Nondestructive Evaluation
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

Keywords

  • Additive manufacturing
  • defect detection
  • in-situ monitoring
  • optical imaging
  • thermal imaging
  • ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Materials Science
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Mechanical Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of In-situ Nondestructive Testing and Ex-situ Methods in Additive Manufactured Specimens for Internal Feature Detection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this