TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of two dose and three dose human papillomavirus vaccine schedules
T2 - Cost effectiveness analysis based on transmission model
AU - Jit, Mark
AU - Brisson, Marc
AU - Laprise, Jean Franҫois
AU - Choi, Yoon Hong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/1/7
Y1 - 2015/1/7
N2 - Objective: To investigate the incremental cost effectiveness of two dose human papillomavirus vaccination and of additionally giving a third dose. Design: Cost effectiveness study based on a transmission dynamic model of human papillomavirus vaccination. Two dose schedules for bivalent or quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccines were assumed to provide 10, 20, or 30 years' vaccine type protection and cross protection or lifelong vaccine type protection without cross protection. Three dose schedules were assumed to give lifelong vaccine type and cross protection. Setting: United Kingdom. Population: Males and females aged 12-74 years. Interventions: No, two, or three doses of human papillomavirus vaccine given routinely to 12 year old girls, with an initial catch-up campaign to 18 years. Main outcome measure: Costs (from the healthcare provider's perspective), health related utilities, and incremental cost effectiveness ratios. Results: Giving at least two doses of vaccine seems to be highly cost effective across the entire range of scenarios considered at the quadrivalent vaccine list price of £86.50 (€109.23; $136.00) per dose. If two doses give only 10 years' protection but adding a third dose extends this to lifetime protection, then the third dose also seems to be cost effective at £86.50 per dose (median incremental cost effectiveness ratio £17 000, interquartile range £11 700-£25 800). If two doses protect for more than 20 years, then the third dose will have to be priced substantially lower (median threshold price £31, interquartile range £28-£35) to be cost effective. Results are similar for a bivalent vaccine priced at £80.50 per dose and when the same scenarios are explored by parameterising a Canadian model (HPV-ADVISE) with economic data from the United Kingdom. Conclusions: Two dose human papillomavirus vaccine schedules are likely to be the most cost effective option provided protection lasts for at least 20 years. As the precise duration of two dose schedules may not be known for decades, cohorts given two doses should be closely monitored.
AB - Objective: To investigate the incremental cost effectiveness of two dose human papillomavirus vaccination and of additionally giving a third dose. Design: Cost effectiveness study based on a transmission dynamic model of human papillomavirus vaccination. Two dose schedules for bivalent or quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccines were assumed to provide 10, 20, or 30 years' vaccine type protection and cross protection or lifelong vaccine type protection without cross protection. Three dose schedules were assumed to give lifelong vaccine type and cross protection. Setting: United Kingdom. Population: Males and females aged 12-74 years. Interventions: No, two, or three doses of human papillomavirus vaccine given routinely to 12 year old girls, with an initial catch-up campaign to 18 years. Main outcome measure: Costs (from the healthcare provider's perspective), health related utilities, and incremental cost effectiveness ratios. Results: Giving at least two doses of vaccine seems to be highly cost effective across the entire range of scenarios considered at the quadrivalent vaccine list price of £86.50 (€109.23; $136.00) per dose. If two doses give only 10 years' protection but adding a third dose extends this to lifetime protection, then the third dose also seems to be cost effective at £86.50 per dose (median incremental cost effectiveness ratio £17 000, interquartile range £11 700-£25 800). If two doses protect for more than 20 years, then the third dose will have to be priced substantially lower (median threshold price £31, interquartile range £28-£35) to be cost effective. Results are similar for a bivalent vaccine priced at £80.50 per dose and when the same scenarios are explored by parameterising a Canadian model (HPV-ADVISE) with economic data from the United Kingdom. Conclusions: Two dose human papillomavirus vaccine schedules are likely to be the most cost effective option provided protection lasts for at least 20 years. As the precise duration of two dose schedules may not be known for decades, cohorts given two doses should be closely monitored.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921326276&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84921326276&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmj.g7584
DO - 10.1136/bmj.g7584
M3 - Article
C2 - 25567037
AN - SCOPUS:84921326276
SN - 0959-8146
VL - 350
JO - BMJ (Online)
JF - BMJ (Online)
M1 - g7584
ER -