TY - JOUR
T1 - Components of effective letters of recommendation
T2 - A cross-sectional survey of academic faculty
AU - Ibrahim, Halah
AU - Mohamad, Mohamad Kasem
AU - Elhag, Shahad Abasaeed
AU - Al-Habbal, Khairat
AU - Harhara, Thana
AU - Shehadeh, Mustafa
AU - Alsoud, Leen Oyoun
AU - Abdel-Razig, Sawsan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright: © 2024 Ibrahim et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2024/1
Y1 - 2024/1
N2 - Introduction Conventional merit-based criteria, including standardized test scores and grade point averages, have become less available to residency programs to help distinguish applicants, making other components of the application, including letters of recommendation (LORs), important surrogate markers for performance. Despite their impact on applications, there is limited published data on LORs in the international setting. Methods A cross-sectional survey of academic faculty was conducted between 9 January 2023 and 12 March 2023 at two large academic medical centers in the United Arab Emirates. Descriptive statistics were used to tabulate variable frequencies. Results Of the 98 respondents, the majority were male (n = 67; 68.4%), Western-trained (n = 66; 67.3%), mid-career physicians (n = 46; 46.9%). Most respondents (n = 77; 78.6%) believed that the purpose of an LOR was to help an applicant match into their desired program. Letters rarely included important skills, such as leadership (n = 37; 37.8%), applicant involvement in research (n = 43; 43.9%), education (n = 38; 38.8%), or patient advocacy (n = 30; 30.6%). Most faculty (n = 81; 82.7%) were not familiar with standardized letters of recommendation. Only 7.3% (n = 7) of respondents previously received training in writing LORs, but 87.7% (n = 86) expressed an interest in this professional development opportunity. Conclusion There is variability in perceptions and practices related to LOR writing in our international setting, with several areas for improvement. Given the increasing importance of LORs to a candidate’s application, faculty development is necessary.
AB - Introduction Conventional merit-based criteria, including standardized test scores and grade point averages, have become less available to residency programs to help distinguish applicants, making other components of the application, including letters of recommendation (LORs), important surrogate markers for performance. Despite their impact on applications, there is limited published data on LORs in the international setting. Methods A cross-sectional survey of academic faculty was conducted between 9 January 2023 and 12 March 2023 at two large academic medical centers in the United Arab Emirates. Descriptive statistics were used to tabulate variable frequencies. Results Of the 98 respondents, the majority were male (n = 67; 68.4%), Western-trained (n = 66; 67.3%), mid-career physicians (n = 46; 46.9%). Most respondents (n = 77; 78.6%) believed that the purpose of an LOR was to help an applicant match into their desired program. Letters rarely included important skills, such as leadership (n = 37; 37.8%), applicant involvement in research (n = 43; 43.9%), education (n = 38; 38.8%), or patient advocacy (n = 30; 30.6%). Most faculty (n = 81; 82.7%) were not familiar with standardized letters of recommendation. Only 7.3% (n = 7) of respondents previously received training in writing LORs, but 87.7% (n = 86) expressed an interest in this professional development opportunity. Conclusion There is variability in perceptions and practices related to LOR writing in our international setting, with several areas for improvement. Given the increasing importance of LORs to a candidate’s application, faculty development is necessary.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85183472522&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85183472522&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0296637
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0296637
M3 - Article
C2 - 38261586
AN - SCOPUS:85183472522
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 19
JO - PloS one
JF - PloS one
IS - 1 January
M1 - e0296637
ER -