Compositional procedural content generation

Julian Togelius; Tróndur Justinussen; Anders Hartzen

Compositional procedural content generation

Julian Togelius, Tróndur Justinussen, Anders Hartzen

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review

Abstract

We consider the strengths and drawbacks of various procedural content generation methods, and how they could be combined to hybrid methods that retain the advantages and avoid the disadvantages of their constituent methods. One answer is composition, where one method is nestled inside another. As an example, we present a hybrid evolutionary-ASP dungeon generator.

Original language	English (US)
Pages	66-69
Number of pages	4
State	Published - 2012
Event	3rd Workshop on Procedural Content Generation in Games, PCG 2012, Organized in Conjunction with the Foundations of Digital Games Conference, FDG 2012 - Raleigh, NC, United States Duration: May 29 2012 → Jun 1 2012

Other

Other	3rd Workshop on Procedural Content Generation in Games, PCG 2012, Organized in Conjunction with the Foundations of Digital Games Conference, FDG 2012
Country/Territory	United States
City	Raleigh, NC
Period	5/29/12 → 6/1/12

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
Human-Computer Interaction
Software

Cite this

Compositional procedural content generation. / Togelius, Julian; Justinussen, Tróndur; Hartzen, Anders.
2012. 66-69 Paper presented at 3rd Workshop on Procedural Content Generation in Games, PCG 2012, Organized in Conjunction with the Foundations of Digital Games Conference, FDG 2012, Raleigh, NC, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review

@conference{ba8bb7b64f37415eb73942d823665263,

title = "Compositional procedural content generation",

abstract = "We consider the strengths and drawbacks of various procedural content generation methods, and how they could be combined to hybrid methods that retain the advantages and avoid the disadvantages of their constituent methods. One answer is composition, where one method is nestled inside another. As an example, we present a hybrid evolutionary-ASP dungeon generator.",

author = "Julian Togelius and Tr{\'o}ndur Justinussen and Anders Hartzen",

year = "2012",

language = "English (US)",

pages = "66--69",

note = "3rd Workshop on Procedural Content Generation in Games, PCG 2012, Organized in Conjunction with the Foundations of Digital Games Conference, FDG 2012 ; Conference date: 29-05-2012 Through 01-06-2012",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Compositional procedural content generation

AU - Togelius, Julian

AU - Justinussen, Tróndur

AU - Hartzen, Anders

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - We consider the strengths and drawbacks of various procedural content generation methods, and how they could be combined to hybrid methods that retain the advantages and avoid the disadvantages of their constituent methods. One answer is composition, where one method is nestled inside another. As an example, we present a hybrid evolutionary-ASP dungeon generator.

AB - We consider the strengths and drawbacks of various procedural content generation methods, and how they could be combined to hybrid methods that retain the advantages and avoid the disadvantages of their constituent methods. One answer is composition, where one method is nestled inside another. As an example, we present a hybrid evolutionary-ASP dungeon generator.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887703796&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887703796&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Paper

AN - SCOPUS:84887703796

SP - 66

EP - 69

T2 - 3rd Workshop on Procedural Content Generation in Games, PCG 2012, Organized in Conjunction with the Foundations of Digital Games Conference, FDG 2012

Y2 - 29 May 2012 through 1 June 2012

ER -

Compositional procedural content generation

Abstract

Other

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this