TY - JOUR
T1 - Computational estimates of mechanical constraints on cell migration through the extracellular matrix
AU - Maxian, Ondrej
AU - Mogilner, Alex
AU - Strychalski, Wanda
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the a grant from the Simons Foundation (https://www. simonsfoundation.org) [429808] to WS, the US Army Research Office grant (https://www.arl.army. mil) [W911NF-17-1-0417] to AM, the National Science Foundation (US) Graduate Research Fellowship (http://www.nsf.gov) [DGE-1342536] to OM, and by the Henry MacCracken fellowship (https://gsas.nyu.edu/content/nyu-as/gsas/ admissions/financial-aid/graduate-school-fellowships-and-assistantships.html) to OM. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. We thank C. Copos for helpful discussions on the remeshing algorithm.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Maxian et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2020/8
Y1 - 2020/8
N2 - Cell migration through a three-dimensional (3D) extracellular matrix (ECM) underlies important physiological phenomena and is based on a variety of mechanical strategies depending on the cell type and the properties of the ECM. By using computer simulations of the cell’s mid-plane, we investigate two such migration mechanisms—‘push-pull’ (forming a finger-like protrusion, adhering to an ECM node, and pulling the cell body forward) and ‘rear-squeezing’ (pushing the cell body through the ECM by contracting the cell cortex and ECM at the cell rear). We present a computational model that accounts for both elastic deformation and forces of the ECM, an active cell cortex and nucleus, and for hydrodynamic forces and flow of the extracellular fluid, cytoplasm, and nucleoplasm. We find that relations between three mechanical parameters—the cortex’s contractile force, nuclear elasticity, and ECM rigidity—determine the effectiveness of cell migration through the dense ECM. The cell can migrate persistently even if its cortical contraction cannot deform a near-rigid ECM, but then the contraction of the cortex has to be able to sufficiently deform the nucleus. The cell can also migrate even if it fails to deform a stiff nucleus, but then it has to be able to sufficiently deform the ECM. Simulation results show that nuclear stiffness limits the cell migration more than the ECM rigidity. Simulations show the rear-squeezing mechanism of motility results in more robust migration with larger cell displacements than those with the push-pull mechanism over a range of parameter values. Additionally, results show that the rear-squeezing mechanism is aided by hydrodynamics through a pressure gradient.
AB - Cell migration through a three-dimensional (3D) extracellular matrix (ECM) underlies important physiological phenomena and is based on a variety of mechanical strategies depending on the cell type and the properties of the ECM. By using computer simulations of the cell’s mid-plane, we investigate two such migration mechanisms—‘push-pull’ (forming a finger-like protrusion, adhering to an ECM node, and pulling the cell body forward) and ‘rear-squeezing’ (pushing the cell body through the ECM by contracting the cell cortex and ECM at the cell rear). We present a computational model that accounts for both elastic deformation and forces of the ECM, an active cell cortex and nucleus, and for hydrodynamic forces and flow of the extracellular fluid, cytoplasm, and nucleoplasm. We find that relations between three mechanical parameters—the cortex’s contractile force, nuclear elasticity, and ECM rigidity—determine the effectiveness of cell migration through the dense ECM. The cell can migrate persistently even if its cortical contraction cannot deform a near-rigid ECM, but then the contraction of the cortex has to be able to sufficiently deform the nucleus. The cell can also migrate even if it fails to deform a stiff nucleus, but then it has to be able to sufficiently deform the ECM. Simulation results show that nuclear stiffness limits the cell migration more than the ECM rigidity. Simulations show the rear-squeezing mechanism of motility results in more robust migration with larger cell displacements than those with the push-pull mechanism over a range of parameter values. Additionally, results show that the rear-squeezing mechanism is aided by hydrodynamics through a pressure gradient.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090563616&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85090563616&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008160
DO - 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008160
M3 - Article
C2 - 32853248
AN - SCOPUS:85090563616
SN - 1553-734X
VL - 16
JO - PLoS computational biology
JF - PLoS computational biology
IS - 8
M1 - e1008160
ER -