TY - JOUR
T1 - Conference Rubric Development for STEM Librarians’ Publications
AU - Over, Sarah
AU - McAllister, James
AU - Morrow, Debbie
AU - Jones, Sylvia
AU - Pixton, David
AU - Prosser, Eric
AU - Gupta, Aditi
AU - Magid, Amani
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Librarians within the Engineering Libraries Division (ELD) annually publish conference papers for the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). The existing ASEE rubric was not sufficient for our members, so we developed a new rubric as a charged committee for this task. We briefly discuss the sparse literature in this area, focusing on the use of rubrics and the rationale behind them. Due to this lack of literature, our committee primarily utilized additional sources such as rubrics found from other professional organizations in STEM and library fields. Our rubric is designed to encourage substantive feedback and growth of authors during the process, while clarifying the expectations for submissions. This rubric consists of overall guidance and specific needs, with flexibility for the different research methods and applications expected (i.e. work-in-progress/completed research, quantitative/qualitative, etc.). We implemented this rubric successfully for the 2021 conference cycle, but will further refine it as needed, based on feedback following future conferences. With scarce literature on conference peer review, we hope by sharing our work, others may also consider and improve their organizations’ processes.
AB - Librarians within the Engineering Libraries Division (ELD) annually publish conference papers for the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). The existing ASEE rubric was not sufficient for our members, so we developed a new rubric as a charged committee for this task. We briefly discuss the sparse literature in this area, focusing on the use of rubrics and the rationale behind them. Due to this lack of literature, our committee primarily utilized additional sources such as rubrics found from other professional organizations in STEM and library fields. Our rubric is designed to encourage substantive feedback and growth of authors during the process, while clarifying the expectations for submissions. This rubric consists of overall guidance and specific needs, with flexibility for the different research methods and applications expected (i.e. work-in-progress/completed research, quantitative/qualitative, etc.). We implemented this rubric successfully for the 2021 conference cycle, but will further refine it as needed, based on feedback following future conferences. With scarce literature on conference peer review, we hope by sharing our work, others may also consider and improve their organizations’ processes.
KW - Conference publications
KW - conference rubrics
KW - engineering librarians
KW - peer review processes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130906102&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85130906102&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/0194262X.2022.2067931
DO - 10.1080/0194262X.2022.2067931
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85130906102
SN - 0194-262X
VL - 41
SP - 432
EP - 439
JO - Science and Technology Libraries
JF - Science and Technology Libraries
IS - 4
ER -