Conquered or granted? A history of suffrage extensions

Adam Przeworski

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Why was franchise extended to the lower classses and to women? Was it conquered by the excluded groups, threatening that unless they were admitted as citizens they would reach for power by other, revolutionary, means? Or was it voluntarily granted by the incumbent elites? This question is examined statistically, using a new dataset covering the entire world from the inception of representative institutions until now. The general picture that emerges is that the poorer classes fought their way into the representative institutions and, once admitted, they were organized by different political parties. In pursuit of their economic and social goals, these parties sought to enhance their electoral positions, treating the issue of female suffrage as an instrument of electoral competition.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)291-321
    Number of pages31
    JournalBritish Journal of Political Science
    Volume39
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Apr 2009

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Conquered or granted? A history of suffrage extensions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this