Construing the Essence: The Effects of Construal Level on Genetic Attributions for Individual and Social Group Differences

Jaime L. Napier; Jamie B. Luguri; John F. Dovidio; Kathleen A. Oltman

doi:10.1177/0146167218768799

Construing the Essence: The Effects of Construal Level on Genetic Attributions for Individual and Social Group Differences

Jaime L. Napier, Jamie B. Luguri, John F. Dovidio, Kathleen A. Oltman

Psychology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The present research links a nonsocial, contextual influence (construal level) to the tendency to endorse genetic attributions for individual and social group differences. Studies 1 to 3 show that people thinking in an abstract (vs. concrete) mind-set score higher on a measure of genetic attributions for individual and racial group differences. Study 4 showed that abstract (vs. concrete) construal also increased genetic attributions for novel groups. Study 5 explored the potential downstream consequences of construal on intergroup attitudes, and found that abstract (vs. concrete) construal led people to endorse genetic attributions in general and this was associated with increased anti-Black prejudice.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1395-1407
Number of pages	13
Journal	Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume	44
Issue number	9
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218768799
State	Published - Sep 1 2018

Keywords

construal-level theory
essentialism
genetic attributions
prejudice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Social Psychology

Access to Document

10.1177/0146167218768799

Cite this

@article{4c2d0d1953b747fd9b4084a11fb93d4f,

title = "Construing the Essence: The Effects of Construal Level on Genetic Attributions for Individual and Social Group Differences",

abstract = "The present research links a nonsocial, contextual influence (construal level) to the tendency to endorse genetic attributions for individual and social group differences. Studies 1 to 3 show that people thinking in an abstract (vs. concrete) mind-set score higher on a measure of genetic attributions for individual and racial group differences. Study 4 showed that abstract (vs. concrete) construal also increased genetic attributions for novel groups. Study 5 explored the potential downstream consequences of construal on intergroup attitudes, and found that abstract (vs. concrete) construal led people to endorse genetic attributions in general and this was associated with increased anti-Black prejudice.",

keywords = "construal-level theory, essentialism, genetic attributions, prejudice",

author = "Napier, {Jaime L.} and Luguri, {Jamie B.} and Dovidio, {John F.} and Oltman, {Kathleen A.}",

year = "2018",

month = sep,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/0146167218768799",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "44",

pages = "1395--1407",

journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin",

issn = "0146-1672",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Construing the Essence

T2 - The Effects of Construal Level on Genetic Attributions for Individual and Social Group Differences

AU - Napier, Jaime L.

AU - Luguri, Jamie B.

AU - Dovidio, John F.

AU - Oltman, Kathleen A.

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - The present research links a nonsocial, contextual influence (construal level) to the tendency to endorse genetic attributions for individual and social group differences. Studies 1 to 3 show that people thinking in an abstract (vs. concrete) mind-set score higher on a measure of genetic attributions for individual and racial group differences. Study 4 showed that abstract (vs. concrete) construal also increased genetic attributions for novel groups. Study 5 explored the potential downstream consequences of construal on intergroup attitudes, and found that abstract (vs. concrete) construal led people to endorse genetic attributions in general and this was associated with increased anti-Black prejudice.

AB - The present research links a nonsocial, contextual influence (construal level) to the tendency to endorse genetic attributions for individual and social group differences. Studies 1 to 3 show that people thinking in an abstract (vs. concrete) mind-set score higher on a measure of genetic attributions for individual and racial group differences. Study 4 showed that abstract (vs. concrete) construal also increased genetic attributions for novel groups. Study 5 explored the potential downstream consequences of construal on intergroup attitudes, and found that abstract (vs. concrete) construal led people to endorse genetic attributions in general and this was associated with increased anti-Black prejudice.

KW - construal-level theory

KW - essentialism

KW - genetic attributions

KW - prejudice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051086260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051086260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0146167218768799

DO - 10.1177/0146167218768799

M3 - Article

C2 - 29716421

AN - SCOPUS:85051086260

VL - 44

SP - 1395

EP - 1407

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

SN - 0146-1672

IS - 9

ER -

Construing the Essence: The Effects of Construal Level on Genetic Attributions for Individual and Social Group Differences

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this