Consultation Training: 26 Years and Three Questions

Judith L. Alpert, Shilpa R. Taufique

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to further graduate-level training in school consultation. Three questions that the first author has encountered throughout the last 26 years while teaching consultation are illuminated in this article: (1) What criteria should be used in selecting a consultation placement? (2) What criteria should be used in selecting a field supervisor? (3) What criteria should be used in evaluating the work of the consultants in the consultation course? Placing these questions into currency in the school psychology training literature may ensue more thinking around these critical issues. A case example provided by the second author is used in synergy with the questions and serves to expound on them.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)13-33
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Educational and Psychological Consultation
Volume13
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Psychology (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Consultation Training: 26 Years and Three Questions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this