TY - JOUR
T1 - Contracts and externalities
T2 - How things fall apart
AU - Genicot, Garance
AU - Ray, Debraj
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Jean-Pierre Benoît, Eric Maskin and Andrew Postlewaite for useful discussions, and Chinua Achebe for inspiring the title. We are grateful for comments by seminar participants at Ecares, Georgetown University, Penn State University, Cornell University, the South West Economic Theory conference at UCLA, and Yale University. Genicot gratefully acknowledges support under a Research and Writing grant from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and Ray acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation Grant No. 0241070.
PY - 2006/11
Y1 - 2006/11
N2 - A single principal interacts with several agents, offering them contracts. The crucial assumption of this paper is that the outside-option payoffs of the agents depend positively on how many uncontracted or "free" agents there are. We study how such a principal, unwelcome though he may be, approaches the problem of contract provision to agents when coordination failure among the latter group is explicitly ruled out. Two variants are considered. When the principal cannot re-approach agents, there is a unique equilibrium, in which contract provision is split up into two phases. In phase 1, simultaneous offers at good (though varying) terms are made to a number of agents. In phase 2, offers must be made sequentially, and their values are "discontinuously" lower: they are close to the very lowest of all the outside options. When the principal can repeatedly approach the same agent, there is a multiplicity of equilibria. In some of these, the agents have the power to force delay. They can hold off the principal's overtures temporarily, but they must succumb in finite time. In both models, despite being able to coordinate their actions, agents cannot resist an "invasion" by the principal and hold to their best payoff. It is in this sense that "things [eventually] fall apart".
AB - A single principal interacts with several agents, offering them contracts. The crucial assumption of this paper is that the outside-option payoffs of the agents depend positively on how many uncontracted or "free" agents there are. We study how such a principal, unwelcome though he may be, approaches the problem of contract provision to agents when coordination failure among the latter group is explicitly ruled out. Two variants are considered. When the principal cannot re-approach agents, there is a unique equilibrium, in which contract provision is split up into two phases. In phase 1, simultaneous offers at good (though varying) terms are made to a number of agents. In phase 2, offers must be made sequentially, and their values are "discontinuously" lower: they are close to the very lowest of all the outside options. When the principal can repeatedly approach the same agent, there is a multiplicity of equilibria. In some of these, the agents have the power to force delay. They can hold off the principal's overtures temporarily, but they must succumb in finite time. In both models, despite being able to coordinate their actions, agents cannot resist an "invasion" by the principal and hold to their best payoff. It is in this sense that "things [eventually] fall apart".
KW - Bilateral contracting
KW - Coordination game
KW - Delays
KW - Exploitation
KW - Multilateral externalities
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750019766&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750019766&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jet.2005.06.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jet.2005.06.003
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:33750019766
SN - 0022-0531
VL - 131
SP - 71
EP - 100
JO - Journal of Economic Theory
JF - Journal of Economic Theory
IS - 1
ER -