Abstract
In the original article, there was a mistake in the caption for Figure 5. The caption incorrectly states that the figure was from Reed et al. (2011) however the figure was reprinted from Litchfield and Donovan (2016) with permission. The correct legend appears below. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated. Figure 5. Reprinted from Litchfield and Donovan (2016) with permission. Two different experience groups—expert radiologists and psychology students—searched for lung nodules from CXR images using the flash-preview moving window (FPMW) paradigm. Participants looked at the target word for 15 s (“lung nodule”). They then saw a fixation cross for 200ms, then either a mask preview (random array of colored pixels) or a CXR (a ‘scene’ preview) for 250ms. Next, participants saw a mask for 50ms and then a second fixation cross for 400ms. Following a second presentation of the fixation cross, they conducted a windowed search, with a 2.5-degree radius window restricting the field of view (Litchfield and Donovan, 2016).
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | 272 |
Journal | Frontiers in Human Neuroscience |
Volume | 13 |
DOIs |
|
State | Published - Aug 13 2019 |
Keywords
- attention
- expertise
- gist
- holistic processing
- perceptual learning
- radiology
- visual perception
- visual search
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Neurology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Biological Psychiatry
- Behavioral Neuroscience