Corrigendum to “Reinforcement learning across development: What insights can we draw from a decade of research?" [Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 40 (2019) 100733]

The authors regret that the second sentence of the caption for Figure 2 on p. 5 should have read a follows: In a two-armed bandit task with static and equivalent reward probabilities, and rewards that differed in their magnitudes, agents generally earned the most reward by implementing a higher negative relative to positive learning rate (B). The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.