TY - JOUR
T1 - Cost-effectiveness of a post-exposure HIV chemoprophylaxis program for blood exposures in health care workers
AU - Marin, Matthew G.
AU - Van Lieu, Jaclyn
AU - Yee, Albert
AU - Bonner, Eileen
AU - Glied, Sherry
PY - 1999/9
Y1 - 1999/9
N2 - We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of a post-exposure chemoprophylaxis program for health care workers who sustained exposures to blood. We analyzed a program of (1) treatment with zidovudine alone versus no treatment and (2) treatment with three-drug therapy versus no treatment. Assuming that 35% of exposures were to HIV-positive sources, the zidovudine regimen prevented 53 HIV seroconversions per 100,000 exposures, at a societal cost of $2.0 million per case of HIV prevented. The cost per quality-adjusted life year saved was $175,222. A three-drug chemoprophylactic therapy program (postulating 100 % effectiveness and 35 % source HIV positivity), prevented 66 seroconversions per 100, 000 exposures, at a cost of $2.1 million per case of HIV prevented and $190,392 per quality-adjusted life year saved. Treating sources known to be HIV-positive and treating severe exposures were the most cost-effective strategies.
AB - We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of a post-exposure chemoprophylaxis program for health care workers who sustained exposures to blood. We analyzed a program of (1) treatment with zidovudine alone versus no treatment and (2) treatment with three-drug therapy versus no treatment. Assuming that 35% of exposures were to HIV-positive sources, the zidovudine regimen prevented 53 HIV seroconversions per 100,000 exposures, at a societal cost of $2.0 million per case of HIV prevented. The cost per quality-adjusted life year saved was $175,222. A three-drug chemoprophylactic therapy program (postulating 100 % effectiveness and 35 % source HIV positivity), prevented 66 seroconversions per 100, 000 exposures, at a cost of $2.1 million per case of HIV prevented and $190,392 per quality-adjusted life year saved. Treating sources known to be HIV-positive and treating severe exposures were the most cost-effective strategies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032887276&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032887276&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00043764-199909000-00007
DO - 10.1097/00043764-199909000-00007
M3 - Article
C2 - 10491791
AN - SCOPUS:0032887276
SN - 1076-2752
VL - 41
SP - 754
EP - 760
JO - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
JF - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
IS - 9
ER -