TY - JOUR
T1 - Costs and Benefits of a Market-Based Model of Ideological Choice
T2 - Responding to Consumers and Critics
AU - Jost, John T.
AU - Gries, Thomas
AU - Müller, Veronika
N1 - Funding Information:
We appreciate the time and energy our critical commentators devoted to responding to our work. We also thank David Caicedo, Wil Cunningham, Aijia Gao, Lola Girerd, Shahrzad Goudarzi, Erin Hennes, Orsolya Hunyady, Taeik Kim, and Felipe Vilanova for very helpful discussions of our target article and the commentaries we received. Finally, we acknowledge the work of Flávio Azevedo in providing data used to rebut specific objection in Tables 4 and 5.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - In a target article, we introduced a formal decision-making model of ideological choice to understand how individuals choose among alternatives in electoral contexts in which multiple parties and candidates compete to address voters’ material and psychological needs. In this rejoinder we respond to very thoughtful comments by Eibach; McDermott; Zmigrod; Molnar & Loewenstein, and Osborne, Satherley & Sibley. We also seek to correct a number of misrepresentations of the current state of knowledge in political psychology based on a few of the commentaries, especially that of Costello, Clark, and Tetlock. Finally, we revisit thorny questions of rationality and irrationality in the market for belief systems.
AB - In a target article, we introduced a formal decision-making model of ideological choice to understand how individuals choose among alternatives in electoral contexts in which multiple parties and candidates compete to address voters’ material and psychological needs. In this rejoinder we respond to very thoughtful comments by Eibach; McDermott; Zmigrod; Molnar & Loewenstein, and Osborne, Satherley & Sibley. We also seek to correct a number of misrepresentations of the current state of knowledge in political psychology based on a few of the commentaries, especially that of Costello, Clark, and Tetlock. Finally, we revisit thorny questions of rationality and irrationality in the market for belief systems.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133535025&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85133535025&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/1047840X.2022.2065135
DO - 10.1080/1047840X.2022.2065135
M3 - Letter
AN - SCOPUS:85133535025
SN - 1047-840X
VL - 33
SP - 123
EP - 137
JO - Psychological Inquiry
JF - Psychological Inquiry
IS - 2
ER -