TY - JOUR
T1 - Critical thinking skills and reflective judgment development
T2 - Redefining the aims of higher education
AU - Brabeck, Mary M.
PY - 1983
Y1 - 1983
N2 - Educators who agree that critical thinking and intellectual development are appropriate aims of higher education do not always agree on what constitutes good thinking. This study examined the relationship between two constructs that attempt to describe that aim: critical thinking as defined by the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal and a stage model of adolescent and adult intellectual development described as reflective judgment. In a 2 × 4 design, 119 women students at four educational levels were matched on high and low extremes of critical thinking scores and were compared on the basis of their scores on the Reflective Judgment Interview. The results indicate: (a) a significant main effect for educational level: students at higher educational levels achieved higher scores on the reflective judgment measure; (b) a main effect for critical thinking: high critical thinking subjects out-performed low critical thinking subjects on the Reflective Judgment Interview; and (c) while low critical thinking subjects were homogeneously low in reflective judgment levels, high critical thinking subjects had significantly greater variability of Reflective Judgment Interview scores.
AB - Educators who agree that critical thinking and intellectual development are appropriate aims of higher education do not always agree on what constitutes good thinking. This study examined the relationship between two constructs that attempt to describe that aim: critical thinking as defined by the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal and a stage model of adolescent and adult intellectual development described as reflective judgment. In a 2 × 4 design, 119 women students at four educational levels were matched on high and low extremes of critical thinking scores and were compared on the basis of their scores on the Reflective Judgment Interview. The results indicate: (a) a significant main effect for educational level: students at higher educational levels achieved higher scores on the reflective judgment measure; (b) a main effect for critical thinking: high critical thinking subjects out-performed low critical thinking subjects on the Reflective Judgment Interview; and (c) while low critical thinking subjects were homogeneously low in reflective judgment levels, high critical thinking subjects had significantly greater variability of Reflective Judgment Interview scores.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0007350342&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0007350342&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0193-3973(83)90056-4
DO - 10.1016/0193-3973(83)90056-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0007350342
SN - 0193-3973
VL - 4
SP - 23
EP - 34
JO - Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
JF - Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
IS - 1
ER -