Crowd-sourced Text Analysis: Reproducible and Agile Production of Political Data

Kenneth Benoit, Drew Conway, Benjamin E. Lauderdale, Michael Laver, Slava Mikhaylov

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Empirical social science often relies on data that are not observed in the field, but are transformed into quantitative variables by expert researchers who analyze and interpret qualitative raw sources. While generally considered the most valid way to produce data, this expert-driven process is inherently difficult to replicate or to assess on grounds of reliability. Using crowd-sourcing to distribute text for reading and interpretation by massive numbers of nonexperts, we generate results comparable to those using experts to read and interpret the same texts, but do so far more quickly and flexibly. Crucially, the data we collect can be reproduced and extended transparently, making crowd-sourced datasets intrinsically reproducible. This focuses researchers' attention on the fundamental scientific objective of specifying reliable and replicable methods for collecting the data needed, rather than on the content of any particular dataset. We also show that our approach works straightforwardly with different types of political text, written in different languages. While findings reported here concern text analysis, they have far-reaching implications for expert-generated data in the social sciences.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)278-295
    Number of pages18
    JournalAmerican Political Science Review
    Volume110
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - May 1 2016

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science
    • Political Science and International Relations

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Crowd-sourced Text Analysis: Reproducible and Agile Production of Political Data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this