TY - JOUR
T1 - Cue-dependent interference in comprehension
AU - Van Dyke, Julie A.
AU - McElree, Brian
N1 - Funding Information:
Portions of this research were supported by NIH/NICHD F32-HD-049215 to New York University (Van Dyke, PI), by NIH/NICHD Grant R01-HD-040353 to Haskins Laboratories (Shankweiler, PI), by NIH/NICHD Grant R21-HD-058944 to Haskins Laboratories (Van Dyke, PI) and by NIH/NICHD Grant R01-HD-056200 to New York University (McElree, PI). We are grateful for the suggestions of Ev Fedorenko and two anonymous reviewers on earlier versions of this manuscript.
PY - 2011/10
Y1 - 2011/10
N2 - The role of interference as a primary determinant of forgetting in memory has long been accepted, however its role as a contributor to poor comprehension is just beginning to be understood. The current paper reports two studies, in which speed-accuracy tradeoff and eye-tracking methodologies were used with the same materials to provide converging evidence for the role of syntactic and semantic cues as mediators of both proactive (PI) and retroactive interference (RI) during comprehension. Consistent with previous work (e.g., Van Dyke & Lewis, 2003), we found that syntactic constraints at the retrieval site are among the cues that drive retrieval in comprehension, and that these constraints effectively limit interference from potential distractors with semantic/pragmatic properties in common with the target constituent. The data are discussed in terms of a cue-overload account, in which interference both arises from and is mediated through a direct-access retrieval mechanism that utilizes a linear, weighted cue-combinatoric scheme.
AB - The role of interference as a primary determinant of forgetting in memory has long been accepted, however its role as a contributor to poor comprehension is just beginning to be understood. The current paper reports two studies, in which speed-accuracy tradeoff and eye-tracking methodologies were used with the same materials to provide converging evidence for the role of syntactic and semantic cues as mediators of both proactive (PI) and retroactive interference (RI) during comprehension. Consistent with previous work (e.g., Van Dyke & Lewis, 2003), we found that syntactic constraints at the retrieval site are among the cues that drive retrieval in comprehension, and that these constraints effectively limit interference from potential distractors with semantic/pragmatic properties in common with the target constituent. The data are discussed in terms of a cue-overload account, in which interference both arises from and is mediated through a direct-access retrieval mechanism that utilizes a linear, weighted cue-combinatoric scheme.
KW - Comprehension
KW - Retrieval interference
KW - Sentence processing
KW - Speed-accuracy tradeoff
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052023952&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052023952&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jml.2011.05.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jml.2011.05.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:80052023952
SN - 0749-596X
VL - 65
SP - 247
EP - 263
JO - Journal of Memory and Language
JF - Journal of Memory and Language
IS - 3
ER -