Deriving individualised /r/ targets from the acoustics of children’s non-rhotic vowels

Heather Campbell, Tara McAllister Byun

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

Abstract

In visual-acoustic biofeedback for rhotic errors, learners are guided to match the third formant (F3) location to a visual target on a real-time acoustic spectrum. As the acoustic properties of correct English /r/differ across speakers, this study aimed to improve target selection by investigating the validity of individualised targets derived from children’s non-rhotic vowels. A previously proposed prediction formula was adjusted using data from a child normative sample and tested in two groups of children. Study 1 found that predicted values were unexpectedly higher than actual F3 values in children whose /r/ errors had been remediated. To understand this discrepancy, Study 2 applied the formula to typically developing children and found that predicted values were also higher than actual F3 values, suggesting that different normative data might better represent the current samples. An updated formula is proposed, which can be used to generate individualised targets within acoustic biofeedback applications.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages1-18
Number of pages18
JournalClinical Linguistics and Phonetics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jul 15 2017

Fingerprint

acoustics
Acoustics
Values
Group
time
Learner Error
Rhotics
Prediction
Formants

Keywords

  • Articulation disorders
  • biofeedback
  • intervention
  • residual speech errors
  • speech sound disorders

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Deriving individualised /r/ targets from the acoustics of children’s non-rhotic vowels. / Campbell, Heather; McAllister Byun, Tara.

In: Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 15.07.2017, p. 1-18.

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

@article{c867ba09fd2f4f6983975ab5454f7534,
title = "Deriving individualised /r/ targets from the acoustics of children’s non-rhotic vowels",
abstract = "In visual-acoustic biofeedback for rhotic errors, learners are guided to match the third formant (F3) location to a visual target on a real-time acoustic spectrum. As the acoustic properties of correct English /r/differ across speakers, this study aimed to improve target selection by investigating the validity of individualised targets derived from children’s non-rhotic vowels. A previously proposed prediction formula was adjusted using data from a child normative sample and tested in two groups of children. Study 1 found that predicted values were unexpectedly higher than actual F3 values in children whose /r/ errors had been remediated. To understand this discrepancy, Study 2 applied the formula to typically developing children and found that predicted values were also higher than actual F3 values, suggesting that different normative data might better represent the current samples. An updated formula is proposed, which can be used to generate individualised targets within acoustic biofeedback applications.",
keywords = "Articulation disorders, biofeedback, intervention, residual speech errors, speech sound disorders",
author = "Heather Campbell and {McAllister Byun}, Tara",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1080/02699206.2017.1330898",
pages = "1--18",
journal = "Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics",
issn = "0269-9206",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deriving individualised /r/ targets from the acoustics of children’s non-rhotic vowels

AU - Campbell,Heather

AU - McAllister Byun,Tara

PY - 2017/7/15

Y1 - 2017/7/15

N2 - In visual-acoustic biofeedback for rhotic errors, learners are guided to match the third formant (F3) location to a visual target on a real-time acoustic spectrum. As the acoustic properties of correct English /r/differ across speakers, this study aimed to improve target selection by investigating the validity of individualised targets derived from children’s non-rhotic vowels. A previously proposed prediction formula was adjusted using data from a child normative sample and tested in two groups of children. Study 1 found that predicted values were unexpectedly higher than actual F3 values in children whose /r/ errors had been remediated. To understand this discrepancy, Study 2 applied the formula to typically developing children and found that predicted values were also higher than actual F3 values, suggesting that different normative data might better represent the current samples. An updated formula is proposed, which can be used to generate individualised targets within acoustic biofeedback applications.

AB - In visual-acoustic biofeedback for rhotic errors, learners are guided to match the third formant (F3) location to a visual target on a real-time acoustic spectrum. As the acoustic properties of correct English /r/differ across speakers, this study aimed to improve target selection by investigating the validity of individualised targets derived from children’s non-rhotic vowels. A previously proposed prediction formula was adjusted using data from a child normative sample and tested in two groups of children. Study 1 found that predicted values were unexpectedly higher than actual F3 values in children whose /r/ errors had been remediated. To understand this discrepancy, Study 2 applied the formula to typically developing children and found that predicted values were also higher than actual F3 values, suggesting that different normative data might better represent the current samples. An updated formula is proposed, which can be used to generate individualised targets within acoustic biofeedback applications.

KW - Articulation disorders

KW - biofeedback

KW - intervention

KW - residual speech errors

KW - speech sound disorders

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85023748723&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85023748723&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02699206.2017.1330898

DO - 10.1080/02699206.2017.1330898

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 18

JO - Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics

T2 - Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics

JF - Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics

SN - 0269-9206

ER -