TY - JOUR
T1 - Deriving individualised /r/ targets from the acoustics of children’s non-rhotic vowels
AU - Campbell, Heather
AU - McAllister Byun, Tara
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under grant #R01DC013668. The authors are involved in the development of staRt, an app to provide visual-acoustic biofeedback treatment. They do not receive financial compensation for their role in developing the app.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Taylor & Francis.
PY - 2018/1/2
Y1 - 2018/1/2
N2 - In visual-acoustic biofeedback for rhotic errors, learners are guided to match the third formant (F3) location to a visual target on a real-time acoustic spectrum. As the acoustic properties of correct English /r/differ across speakers, this study aimed to improve target selection by investigating the validity of individualised targets derived from children’s non-rhotic vowels. A previously proposed prediction formula was adjusted using data from a child normative sample and tested in two groups of children. Study 1 found that predicted values were unexpectedly higher than actual F3 values in children whose /r/ errors had been remediated. To understand this discrepancy, Study 2 applied the formula to typically developing children and found that predicted values were also higher than actual F3 values, suggesting that different normative data might better represent the current samples. An updated formula is proposed, which can be used to generate individualised targets within acoustic biofeedback applications.
AB - In visual-acoustic biofeedback for rhotic errors, learners are guided to match the third formant (F3) location to a visual target on a real-time acoustic spectrum. As the acoustic properties of correct English /r/differ across speakers, this study aimed to improve target selection by investigating the validity of individualised targets derived from children’s non-rhotic vowels. A previously proposed prediction formula was adjusted using data from a child normative sample and tested in two groups of children. Study 1 found that predicted values were unexpectedly higher than actual F3 values in children whose /r/ errors had been remediated. To understand this discrepancy, Study 2 applied the formula to typically developing children and found that predicted values were also higher than actual F3 values, suggesting that different normative data might better represent the current samples. An updated formula is proposed, which can be used to generate individualised targets within acoustic biofeedback applications.
KW - Articulation disorders
KW - biofeedback
KW - intervention
KW - residual speech errors
KW - speech sound disorders
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85023748723&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85023748723&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02699206.2017.1330898
DO - 10.1080/02699206.2017.1330898
M3 - Article
C2 - 28703653
AN - SCOPUS:85023748723
SN - 0269-9206
VL - 32
SP - 70
EP - 87
JO - Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics
JF - Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics
IS - 1
ER -