TY - JOUR
T1 - Detection of glaucoma progression by population and individual derived variability criteria
AU - Folio, Lindsey S.
AU - Wollstein, Gadi
AU - Kotowski, Jacek
AU - Bilonick, Richard A.
AU - Ling, Yun
AU - Ishikawa, Hiroshi
AU - Kagemann, Larry
AU - Schuman, Joel S.
PY - 2013/4
Y1 - 2013/4
N2 - Purpose: Ocular imaging devices provide quantitative structural information that might improve glaucoma progression detection. This study examined scanning laser polarimetry (SLP) population-derived versus individual-derived cut-off criteria for detecting progression. Methods: Forty-eight healthy, glaucoma suspect and glaucoma subjects, providing 76 eyes were used. All subjects had reliable visual field (VF) and SLP scans acquired at the same visits from ≥4 visits. VF progression was defined by guided progression analysis (GPA) and by the VF index. SLP measurements were analysed by fast mode (FM) GPA, compared with the population rate of progression, and extended mode (EM) GPA, compared with the individual variability. The agreement between progression detection methods was measured. Results: Poor agreement was observed between progression defined by VF and FM and EM. The difference in temporal-superior-nasal-inferior- temporal (TSNIT) average rate of change between VF defined progressors and non-progressors for both FM (p=0.010) and EM (p=0.015) was statistically significant. Conclusions: There is poor agreement between VF and SLP progression regardless of the use of population derived or individual variability criteria. The best SLP progression detection method could not be ascertained, therefore, acquiring three SLP scans per visit is recommended.
AB - Purpose: Ocular imaging devices provide quantitative structural information that might improve glaucoma progression detection. This study examined scanning laser polarimetry (SLP) population-derived versus individual-derived cut-off criteria for detecting progression. Methods: Forty-eight healthy, glaucoma suspect and glaucoma subjects, providing 76 eyes were used. All subjects had reliable visual field (VF) and SLP scans acquired at the same visits from ≥4 visits. VF progression was defined by guided progression analysis (GPA) and by the VF index. SLP measurements were analysed by fast mode (FM) GPA, compared with the population rate of progression, and extended mode (EM) GPA, compared with the individual variability. The agreement between progression detection methods was measured. Results: Poor agreement was observed between progression defined by VF and FM and EM. The difference in temporal-superior-nasal-inferior- temporal (TSNIT) average rate of change between VF defined progressors and non-progressors for both FM (p=0.010) and EM (p=0.015) was statistically significant. Conclusions: There is poor agreement between VF and SLP progression regardless of the use of population derived or individual variability criteria. The best SLP progression detection method could not be ascertained, therefore, acquiring three SLP scans per visit is recommended.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875214607&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875214607&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-301028
DO - 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-301028
M3 - Article
C2 - 23203702
AN - SCOPUS:84875214607
SN - 0007-1161
VL - 97
SP - 403
EP - 407
JO - British Journal of Ophthalmology
JF - British Journal of Ophthalmology
IS - 4
ER -