Did teachers' verbal ability and race matter in the 1960s? Coleman revisited

Ronald G. Ehrenberg, Dominic J. Brewer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Our paper reanalyzes data from the classic 1966 study Equality of Educational Opportunity, or Coleman Report. It addresses whether teacher characteristics, including verbal ability and race, influenced "synthetic gain scores" of students (mean test scores of upper grade students in a school minus mean test scores of lower grade students in a school), in the context of an econometric model that allows for the possibility that teacher characteristics in a school are endogenously determined. We find that verbal aptitude scores of teachers influenced synthetic grain scores for both black and white students. Verbal aptitude mattered as much for black teachers as it did for white teachers. Finally, holding teacher characteristics other than race constant, in some specifications black teachers were associated with higher gain scores for black high school students, but lower gain scores for white elementary and secondary students. Because these findings are for American schools in the mid-1960s, they do not directly apply to our contemporary experience. However, they do raise issues that should be addressed in discussions of hiring policies in American education.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-21
Number of pages21
JournalEconomics of Education Review
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 1995

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Economics and Econometrics


Dive into the research topics of 'Did teachers' verbal ability and race matter in the 1960s? Coleman revisited'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this