Directing retribution: On the political control of lower court judges

Gregory A. Huber, Sanford C. Gordon

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    The sentencing decisions of trial judges are constrained by statutory limits imposed by legislatures. At the same time, judges in many states face periodic review, often by the electorate. We develop a model in which the effects of these features of a judge's political landscape on judicial behavior interact. The model yields several intriguing results: First, if legislators care about the proportionality of punishment, judicial discretion increases with their punitiveness. Second, voters are limited by two factors in their ability to make inferences about judicial preferences based on observed sentences: the extent to which judges are willing to pander to retain office and the range of judicial discretion mandated by the legislature. Finally, legislators can sometimes manipulate judicial discretion to aid sufficiently like-minded voters in their efforts to replace ideologically dissimilar judges.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)386-420
    Number of pages35
    JournalJournal of Law, Economics, and Organization
    Issue number2
    StatePublished - Jun 2007

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics and Econometrics
    • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
    • Law


    Dive into the research topics of 'Directing retribution: On the political control of lower court judges'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this