Disambiguation of ditropic sentences: Acoustic and phonetic cues

D. Van Lancker, G. J. Canter, D. Terbeek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In a previous study, we demonstrated that listeners were highly successful in identifying the intended meaning of spoken ditropic sentences (those which may carry either a literal or an idiomatic meaning) when speakers were instructed to convey the distinction. The present communication reports on acoustic and phonetic analyses carried out with the goal of identifying cues that distinguished the literal and idiomatic utterances. Certain prosodic differences were observed. Literal utterances were systematically longer than idioms. This was partly due to increased use of pauses, as well as to increased duration of major lexical items. Moreover, literal sentences were typically characterized by greater numbers of pitch contours (discernible rise-fall excursions of fundamental frequency) and open junctures than were idiomatic utterances. In addition to suprasegmental contrasts, articulatory distinctions - corresponding to lento-allegro phonological rules - were also observed. These distinctions directly reflect the structural differences intrinsic to the 2 types of utterances. A literal sentence is formulated by the organization of constituent words and phrases. Idioms, on the other hand, are holistic units, largely nontransparent to syntactic structure or the usual meaning of the lexical members.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)330-335
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Speech and Hearing Research
Volume24
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1981

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Disambiguation of ditropic sentences: Acoustic and phonetic cues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this