Disaster, degradation, dystopia

C. Anne Claus, Sarah Osterhoudt, Lauren Baker, Luisa Cortesi, Chris Hebdon, Amy Zhang, Michael R. Dove

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    In this chapter we examine the contributions that the field of political ecology––with its focus on the mutually constitutive relationships between environments, cultures, politics and power––has made, and can continue to make, to a more nuanced understanding of disasters. Disaster research also contributes to political ecology insofar as it illuminates the complexity of relationships between environments and societies over space and time. Drawing from ethnographic examples and historical analysis, we situate epistemologies of disasters within broader analyses of scale-making, nature–culture dichotomies, the classification of disasters as ‘natural’ or ‘social’, the interpretive dimensions of identity and the construction of self. The very definition of a situation as ‘disastrous’ or not varies with one’s political resources. Overall, we argue that political ecology frameworks pose new questions about the operation of power and politics in contexts of disasters, resulting in enriched understandings of the social experience of disasters. Ethnographic examples, such as those presented in this chapter, illustrate the rich promise of continued work at the confluence of the fields of political ecology and disaster studies.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationThe International Handbook of Political Ecology
    PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
    Pages291-304
    Number of pages14
    ISBN (Electronic)9780857936172
    ISBN (Print)9780857936165
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Sciences(all)
    • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
    • Environmental Science(all)

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Disaster, degradation, dystopia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this