TY - JOUR
T1 - Do people take stimulus correlations into account in visual search?
AU - Bhardwaj, Manisha
AU - Van Den Berg, Ronald
AU - Ma, Wei Ji
AU - Josic, Krešimir
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Bhardwaj et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2016/3
Y1 - 2016/3
N2 - In laboratory visual search experiments, distractors are often statistically independent of each other. However, stimuli in more naturalistic settings are often correlated and rarely independent. Here, we examine whether human observers take stimulus correlations into account in orientation target detection. We find that they do, although probably not optimally. In particular, it seems that low distractor correlations are overestimated. Our results might contribute to bridging the gap between artificial and natural visual search tasks.
AB - In laboratory visual search experiments, distractors are often statistically independent of each other. However, stimuli in more naturalistic settings are often correlated and rarely independent. Here, we examine whether human observers take stimulus correlations into account in orientation target detection. We find that they do, although probably not optimally. In particular, it seems that low distractor correlations are overestimated. Our results might contribute to bridging the gap between artificial and natural visual search tasks.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962607558&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962607558&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0149402
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0149402
M3 - Article
C2 - 26963498
AN - SCOPUS:84962607558
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 11
JO - PloS one
JF - PloS one
IS - 3
M1 - e0149402
ER -