Does adding parent education and workforce training to Head Start promote or interfere with children's development?

Terri J. Sabol, Elise Chor, Teresa Eckrich Sommer, Lauren A. Tighe, P. Lindsay Chase-Lansdale, Amanda Sheffield Morris, Jeanne Brooks-Gunn, Hirokazu Yoshikawa, Christopher King

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study explores the effects of the two-generation program CareerAdvance—which combines education and training for parents in healthcare with Head Start for children—on children's academic, language, mathematics, and inhibitory control followed for 3 years. The sample (collected in Tulsa, Oklahoma from 2011 to 2018) includes 147 children in the CareerAdvance group and 139 children in a matched comparison group (n = 286; 40% Black, 17%, White, 10% Hispanic, 33% Mixed Race, or Other Race; M = 3.6 years old; 47% female). Overall, the effect of CareerAdvance on child outcomes is neither greater nor less than Head Start alone. These findings suggest that children's developmental outcomes do not worsen or improve in the short term when their parents return to school.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2102-2118
Number of pages17
JournalChild development
Volume95
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2024

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does adding parent education and workforce training to Head Start promote or interfere with children's development?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this