TY - JOUR
T1 - Does Mindfulness Improve Intergroup Bias, Internalized Bias, and Anti-Bias Outcomes?
T2 - A Meta-Analysis of the Evidence and Agenda for Future Research
AU - Chang, Doris F.
AU - Donald, James
AU - Whitney, Jennifer
AU - Miao, Iris Yi
AU - Sahdra, Baljinder
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.
PY - 2024/10
Y1 - 2024/10
N2 - Whereas mindfulness has been shown to enhance personal well-being, studies suggest it may also benefit intergroup dynamics. Using an integrative conceptual model, this meta-analysis examined associations between mindfulness and (a) different manifestations of bias (implicit/explicit attitudes, affect, behavior) directed toward (b) different bias targets (outgroup or ingroup, e.g., internalized bias), by (c) intergroup orientation (toward bias or anti-bias). Of 70 samples, 42 (N = 3,229) assessed mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) and 30 (N = 6,002) were correlational studies. Results showed a medium-sized negative effect of MBIs on bias outcomes, g = −0.56, 95% confidence interval [−0.72, −0.40]; I(2;3)2: 0.39; 0.48, and a small-to-medium negative effect between mindfulness and bias for correlational studies, r = −0.17 [−0.27, −0.03]; I(2;3)2: 0.11; 0.83. Effects were comparable for intergroup bias and internalized bias. We conclude by identifying gaps in the evidence base to guide future research.
AB - Whereas mindfulness has been shown to enhance personal well-being, studies suggest it may also benefit intergroup dynamics. Using an integrative conceptual model, this meta-analysis examined associations between mindfulness and (a) different manifestations of bias (implicit/explicit attitudes, affect, behavior) directed toward (b) different bias targets (outgroup or ingroup, e.g., internalized bias), by (c) intergroup orientation (toward bias or anti-bias). Of 70 samples, 42 (N = 3,229) assessed mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) and 30 (N = 6,002) were correlational studies. Results showed a medium-sized negative effect of MBIs on bias outcomes, g = −0.56, 95% confidence interval [−0.72, −0.40]; I(2;3)2: 0.39; 0.48, and a small-to-medium negative effect between mindfulness and bias for correlational studies, r = −0.17 [−0.27, −0.03]; I(2;3)2: 0.11; 0.83. Effects were comparable for intergroup bias and internalized bias. We conclude by identifying gaps in the evidence base to guide future research.
KW - bias
KW - mindfulness
KW - prejudice
KW - social justice
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164161757&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85164161757&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/01461672231178518
DO - 10.1177/01461672231178518
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85164161757
SN - 0146-1672
VL - 50
SP - 1487
EP - 1516
JO - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
JF - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
IS - 10
ER -