Dual-task interference in visual working memory: A limitation in storage capacity but not in encoding or retrieval

Daryl Fougnie, René Marois

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The concurrent maintenance of two visual working memory (VWM) arrays can lead to profound interference. It is unclear, however, whether these costs arise from limitations in VWM storage capacity (Fougnie & Marois, 2006) or from interference between the storage of one visual array and encoding or retrieval of another visual array (Cowan & Morey, 2007). Here, we show that encoding a VWM array does not interfere with maintenance of another VWM array unless the two displays exceed maintenance capacity (Experiments 1 and 2). Moreover, manipulating the extent to which encoding and maintenance can interfere with one another had no discernable effect on dual-task performance (Experiment 2). Finally, maintenance of a VWM array was not affected by retrieval of information from another VWM array (Experiment 3). Taken together, these findings demonstrate that dual-task interference between two concurrent VWM tasks is due to a capacity-limited store that is independent from encoding and retrieval processes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1831-1841
Number of pages11
JournalAttention, Perception, and Psychophysics
Volume71
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Dual-task interference in visual working memory: A limitation in storage capacity but not in encoding or retrieval'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this