TY - JOUR
T1 - Ecological implications of the relative rarity of fossil hominins at Laetoli
AU - Su, Denise F.
AU - Harrison, Terry
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank all of the team members who participated in the expeditions to Laetoli that contributed to the recovery of the material discussed here. We thank the Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology and the Unit of Antiquities in Dar es Salaam for permission to conduct research in Tanzania. Special thanks go to N. Kayombo (Director General), P. Msemwa (Director), and all of the curators and staff at the National Museum of Tanzania in Dar es Salaam for their support and assistance. Sarah Freidline helped collect data on extant bovid skeletons. The Government of Kenya and the National Museums of Kenya are thanked for permission to study the collections in Nairobi. For their advice, discussion, help, and support, we gratefully acknowledge the following individuals: P. Andrews, R. Blumenschine, S. Frost, D.M.K. Kamamba, O. Kileo, J. Kingston, A. Kweka, M.G. Leakey, E. Mbua, C.P. Msuya, C.S. Msuya, M. Muungu, J. Pareso, C. Peters, M. Pickford, and K. Reed. Insightful comments from P. Andrews and an anonymous reviewer greatly improved the quality and clarity of the manuscript. Fieldwork at Laetoli was supported by grants from National Geographic Society, the Leakey Foundation, and the National Science Foundation (Grants BCS-0216683, BCS-9903434, and BCS-0309513).
PY - 2008/10
Y1 - 2008/10
N2 - Hominins are a very rare component of the large-mammal fauna at Laetoli. Although no equivalent data are available for Hadar, the much higher count and relative abundance of hominins suggests that they may have been more common at the latter site. The apparent relative rarity of hominins at Laetoli may have significant implications for understanding the ecology of Australopithecus afarensis. However, it is essential to first assess the extent to which taphonomic variables might have been a contributing factor. Using data from fossil ruminants, we show that the survivability of skeletal elements at Laetoli relates to the extent to which they can resist carnivore scavenging and their likelihood of being entirely buried by volcanic ashes and tuffaceous sediments. The rarity of hominins at Laetoli is probably due in part to the influence of these two taphonomic factors. However, these factors cannot account entirely for the difference in hominin relative abundance between these two sites, and ecological differences were probably a contributing factor. The highest population densities of chimpanzees today occur in forest and closed woodland, with reduced densities in open woodland. If similar levels of population-density variation characterized A. afarensis, the differences between Hadar and Laetoli may relate to the quality/optimality of the habitats. Hadar was, in general, much more densely wooded and mesic than Laetoli, with permanent and substantial bodies of water. In contrast, Laetoli was predominantly a woodland-shrubland-grassland mosaic supported only by ephemeral streams and ponds. The apparent greater relative abundance of hominins at Hadar compared with Laetoli suggests that, like chimpanzees, A. afarensis may have been more successful in more densely wooded habitats. Compared with Hadar, Laetoli probably represented a less optimal habitat for the foraging and dietary behavior of A. afarensis, and this is reflected in their inferred lower abundance, density, and biomass.
AB - Hominins are a very rare component of the large-mammal fauna at Laetoli. Although no equivalent data are available for Hadar, the much higher count and relative abundance of hominins suggests that they may have been more common at the latter site. The apparent relative rarity of hominins at Laetoli may have significant implications for understanding the ecology of Australopithecus afarensis. However, it is essential to first assess the extent to which taphonomic variables might have been a contributing factor. Using data from fossil ruminants, we show that the survivability of skeletal elements at Laetoli relates to the extent to which they can resist carnivore scavenging and their likelihood of being entirely buried by volcanic ashes and tuffaceous sediments. The rarity of hominins at Laetoli is probably due in part to the influence of these two taphonomic factors. However, these factors cannot account entirely for the difference in hominin relative abundance between these two sites, and ecological differences were probably a contributing factor. The highest population densities of chimpanzees today occur in forest and closed woodland, with reduced densities in open woodland. If similar levels of population-density variation characterized A. afarensis, the differences between Hadar and Laetoli may relate to the quality/optimality of the habitats. Hadar was, in general, much more densely wooded and mesic than Laetoli, with permanent and substantial bodies of water. In contrast, Laetoli was predominantly a woodland-shrubland-grassland mosaic supported only by ephemeral streams and ponds. The apparent greater relative abundance of hominins at Hadar compared with Laetoli suggests that, like chimpanzees, A. afarensis may have been more successful in more densely wooded habitats. Compared with Hadar, Laetoli probably represented a less optimal habitat for the foraging and dietary behavior of A. afarensis, and this is reflected in their inferred lower abundance, density, and biomass.
KW - Australopithecus afarensis
KW - Carnivores
KW - Paleoecology
KW - Ruminants
KW - Taphonomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=51349161572&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=51349161572&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.07.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.07.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 18760824
AN - SCOPUS:51349161572
SN - 0047-2484
VL - 55
SP - 672
EP - 681
JO - Journal of Human Evolution
JF - Journal of Human Evolution
IS - 4
ER -