Effect of abutment screw surface treatment on reliability of implant-supported crowns

Rodolfo Bruniera Anchieta, Lucas Silveira Machado, Estevam Augusto Bonfante, Ronaldo Hirata, Amilcar Chagas Freitas, Paulo G. Coelho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate and compare the reliability of implant-supported single crownsabutments retained with coated (C) or noncoated (NC) screws and onto platform-switched abutments with coated screws. Materials and Methods: Fifty-four implants (DT Implant 4-mm Standard Platform, Intra-Lock International) were divided into three groups (n = 18 each) as follows: matching-platform abutments secured with noncoated abutment screws (MNC); matching-platform abutments tightened with coated abutment screws (MC); and switched-platform abutments secured with coated abutment screws (SC). Screws were characterized by scanning electron microscopy and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The specimens were subjected to step-stress accelerated life testing. Use-level probability Weibull curves and reliability for 100, 000 cycles at 200 N and 300 N (90%two-sided confidence intervals) were calculated. Polarized light and scanning electron microscopes were used for fractographic analysis. Results: Scanning electron microscopy revealed differences in surface texture; noncoated screws presented the typical machining grooves texture, whereas coated screws presented a plastically deformed surface layer. XPS revealed the same base components for both screws, with the exception of higher degrees of silicon in the SiO2 form for the coated samples. For 100, 000 cycles at 300 N, reliability values were 0.06 (0.01 to 0.16), 0.25 (0.09 to 0.45), and 0.25 (0.08 to 0.45), for MNC, MC, and SC, respectively. The most common failure mechanism for MNC was fracture of the abutment screw, followed by bending, or its fracture, along with fracture of the abutment or implant. Coated abutment screws most commonly fractured along with the abutment, irrespective of abutment type. Conclusion: Reliability was higher for both groups with the coated screw than with the uncoated screw. Failure modes differed between coated and uncoated groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)585-592
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Keywords

  • Abutment screw
  • Biomechanics
  • Dental implants
  • Reliability
  • Weibull curves

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of abutment screw surface treatment on reliability of implant-supported crowns'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this