Effect of finishing instrumentation on the marginal integrity of resin-based composite restorations

Cristina Maresca, Luiz A.F. Pimenta, Harald O. Heymann, Thomas L. Ziemiecki, André V. Ritter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the effect of the use of different finishing instruments on the marginal integrity of resin composite restorations. Materials and Methods: Bovine incisors (N = 75) embedded in epoxy resin had the facial enamel ground and polished to 1200-grit. A standardized cavity (3 × 3 mm, 2 mm deep) was prepared on each specimen and restored with a 2-step total-etch adhesive (Single Bond, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) and a hybrid resin composite (Filtek Z250, 3M ESPE) in a single increment. The restorations were mechanically polished to 1200-grit. Specimens were randomized into different groups (N = 5) according to finishing technique: positive control (1200-grit paper), negative control (regular-grit diamond), fine cross-cut laminated burs, straight-cut laminated burs, spiral-cut laminated burs, and finishing diamonds. The straight-cut burs, spiral-cut burs, and finishing diamonds were tested individually as fine, extra-fine, and ultra-fine, as well as sequentially as a series. A high-speed, water-cooled handpiece under standardized pressure (0.5 N) and time (40 seconds) was used for all finishing procedures. Specimens were processed for scanning electron microscope, and margin gaps were systematically measured. Data were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance and Duncan test. Results: The negative control specimens (course diamond) presented the largest gaps, whereas the positive control specimens (mechanically polished) generated the smallest gaps. No statistically significant difference was noted between the finishing diamonds and the positive control. The negative control exhibited significantly larger gaps when compared with the other finishing instruments. Intermediate results were observed for cross-cut, straight-cut, and spiral-cut laminated burs. Fine, extra-fine and ultra-fine finishing diamonds generated smaller gaps compared with laminated burs, but the differences were not always statistically significant. Conclusion: Fine, extra-fine and ultra-fine finishing diamonds used to finish composite restorations generated better marginal integrity when compared with carbides and regular-grit diamonds. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE When finishing composite restorations, finishing diamond burs result in better composite margins than carbide laminated burs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)104-112
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of finishing instrumentation on the marginal integrity of resin-based composite restorations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this