Abstract
QUESTIONS CONCLUSIONS PRESENTED BY P. SAUGSTAD (SEE 40:4) IN HIS RECENT DISCUSSION OF FOOD-DEPRIVATION EFFECTS ON PERCEPTION-COGNITION. EVIDENCE IS CITED FROM STUDIES WHICH INDICATE THAT CONTRARY TO SAUGSTAD'S CONCLUSIONS, AMBIGUOUS STIMULI, WORD-ASSOCIATION TASKS AND TASKS REQUIRING AN ACCURATE RESPONSE DO YIELD A DEPRIVATION EFFECT. DISCUSSES THE PROBLEM OF MEASURING HUNGER, STRESSING THE IMPORTANCE OF INVESTIGATING INTERACTIONS AMONG RELEVANT VARIABLES. (20 REF.) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 342-344 |
Number of pages | 3 |
Journal | Psychological bulletin |
Volume | 68 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 1967 |
Keywords
- PERCEPTION-COGNITION, COMMENT
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Psychology(all)