Effect of simplified one-step drilling protocol on osseointegration

Arpita Patel; Luiz Fernando Gil; Arthur Castellano; Gileade Freitas; Daniel Navarro; Ana P. Peredo; Nick Tovar; Paulo Coelho

doi:10.11607/prd.2755

Effect of simplified one-step drilling protocol on osseointegration

Arpita Patel, Luiz Fernando Gil, Arthur Castellano, Gileade Freitas, Daniel Navarro, Ana P. Peredo, Nick Tovar, Paulo Coelho

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This study was designed to compare the combined effect of two different drilling techniques (conventional expansion and one-step) and four different implant geometries in a beagle dog model. The nondecalcified bone-implant samples underwent histologic/metric analysis at 2 and 6 weeks. Morphologic analysis showed similarities between different drilling technique groups and implant geometries. Histomorphometric parameters, bone-to-implant contact (BIC), and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) were analyzed, and no statistical difference between drilling groups and/or implant geometry was found. Time was the only variable that affected BIC and BAFO, suggesting that the two protocols are equally biocompatible and osseoconductive.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	e82-e87
Journal	International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry
Volume	36
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2755
State	Published - 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Medicine

Access to Document

10.11607/prd.2755

Cite this

@article{b303f8e5ecbb4ce6897e7684d9a17202,

title = "Effect of simplified one-step drilling protocol on osseointegration",

abstract = "This study was designed to compare the combined effect of two different drilling techniques (conventional expansion and one-step) and four different implant geometries in a beagle dog model. The nondecalcified bone-implant samples underwent histologic/metric analysis at 2 and 6 weeks. Morphologic analysis showed similarities between different drilling technique groups and implant geometries. Histomorphometric parameters, bone-to-implant contact (BIC), and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) were analyzed, and no statistical difference between drilling groups and/or implant geometry was found. Time was the only variable that affected BIC and BAFO, suggesting that the two protocols are equally biocompatible and osseoconductive.",

author = "Arpita Patel and Gil, {Luiz Fernando} and Arthur Castellano and Gileade Freitas and Daniel Navarro and Peredo, {Ana P.} and Nick Tovar and Paulo Coelho",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016 by Quintessence Publishing Co Inc.",

year = "2016",

doi = "10.11607/prd.2755",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "36",

pages = "e82--e87",

journal = "International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry",

issn = "0198-7569",

publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Company",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of simplified one-step drilling protocol on osseointegration

AU - Patel, Arpita

AU - Gil, Luiz Fernando

AU - Castellano, Arthur

AU - Freitas, Gileade

AU - Navarro, Daniel

AU - Peredo, Ana P.

AU - Tovar, Nick

AU - Coelho, Paulo

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This study was designed to compare the combined effect of two different drilling techniques (conventional expansion and one-step) and four different implant geometries in a beagle dog model. The nondecalcified bone-implant samples underwent histologic/metric analysis at 2 and 6 weeks. Morphologic analysis showed similarities between different drilling technique groups and implant geometries. Histomorphometric parameters, bone-to-implant contact (BIC), and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) were analyzed, and no statistical difference between drilling groups and/or implant geometry was found. Time was the only variable that affected BIC and BAFO, suggesting that the two protocols are equally biocompatible and osseoconductive.

AB - This study was designed to compare the combined effect of two different drilling techniques (conventional expansion and one-step) and four different implant geometries in a beagle dog model. The nondecalcified bone-implant samples underwent histologic/metric analysis at 2 and 6 weeks. Morphologic analysis showed similarities between different drilling technique groups and implant geometries. Histomorphometric parameters, bone-to-implant contact (BIC), and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) were analyzed, and no statistical difference between drilling groups and/or implant geometry was found. Time was the only variable that affected BIC and BAFO, suggesting that the two protocols are equally biocompatible and osseoconductive.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84984863657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84984863657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.11607/prd.2755

DO - 10.11607/prd.2755

M3 - Article

C2 - 27560682

AN - SCOPUS:84984863657

SN - 0198-7569

VL - 36

SP - e82-e87

JO - International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry

JF - International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry

IS - 5

ER -

Effect of simplified one-step drilling protocol on osseointegration

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this