Effect of simplified one-step drilling protocol on osseointegration

Arpita Patel, Luiz Fernando Gil, Arthur Castellano, Gileade Freitas, Daniel Navarro, Ana P. Peredo, Nick Tovar, Paulo Coelho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study was designed to compare the combined effect of two different drilling techniques (conventional expansion and one-step) and four different implant geometries in a beagle dog model. The nondecalcified bone-implant samples underwent histologic/metric analysis at 2 and 6 weeks. Morphologic analysis showed similarities between different drilling technique groups and implant geometries. Histomorphometric parameters, bone-to-implant contact (BIC), and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) were analyzed, and no statistical difference between drilling groups and/or implant geometry was found. Time was the only variable that affected BIC and BAFO, suggesting that the two protocols are equally biocompatible and osseoconductive.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e82-e87
JournalInternational Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry
Volume36
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery
  • Periodontics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of simplified one-step drilling protocol on osseointegration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Patel, A., Gil, L. F., Castellano, A., Freitas, G., Navarro, D., Peredo, A. P., Tovar, N., & Coelho, P. (2016). Effect of simplified one-step drilling protocol on osseointegration. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 36(5), e82-e87. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2755